Parasitism potential of Dirhinus giffardii (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) on pupae of the fruit fly species, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) and Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), during variable exposure durations

被引:6
作者
Ullah, Fazl [1 ]
Farooq, Muzammil [1 ]
Honey, Sabyan Faris [1 ]
Zada, Naeem [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Agr & Biosci Int CABI, Reg Biosci Ctr, 1-A Opposite Data Gunj Bakhsh Rd,POB 8, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Dirhinus giffardii; Bactrocera dorsalis; Zeugodacus cucurbitae; Fruit flies; Exposure time;
D O I
10.1186/s41938-020-00354-6
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Fruit flies are important insect pests of horticultural crops. Pesticides used to control them which cause environmental and health hazards; therefore, other alternative sustainable management measures are required. Main body Successful implementation of an integrated pest management program, using biological control agents, needs synchronization of parasitoids with hosts selection and exposure time. The present study was conducted to assess the biological activity of the parasitoid species, Dirhinus giffardii (Silvestri) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), against the melon fruit fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett), and the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae), at different exposure durations (24, 48, and 72 h). The experiments were conducted under standard laboratory conditions. Significant differences in the parasitism rate of D. giffardii were observed for both species at different exposure durations. The maximum parasitism rate of D. giffardii (52.60 +/- 2.84%) and (42.73 +/- 2.74%) was observed at 48-h exposure period for Z. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis, respectively. Also, a comparison between both species showed a difference in parasitism rate at 24 and 48 h and a positive correlation between percent parasitism and exposure duration. Adult emergence of D. giffardii showed a maximum emergence rate from pupae of Z. cucurbitae (63.55 +/- 4.02%) and B. dorsalis (51.61 +/- 2.33%) at 10 days interval, respectively. However, the daily emergence of the parasitoid was not correlated to exposure duration in both species. The results of the present study may serve in the mass rearing of D. giffardii. Conclusion The biological activity of D. giffardii was maximum at 48 h of exposure for both fruit fly species, and this important information may improve the mass rearing technology of D. giffardii.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Int J Sustain Agric
[2]  
Aziz SS., 2018, SCI INQ REV, V2, P43, DOI [10.32350/sir.24.05, DOI 10.32350/SIR.24.05]
[3]  
Farooq M., 2019, ACAD J AGR RES, V7, P224
[4]   Performance of two fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) pupal parasitoids (Coptera haywardi [Hymenoptera: Diapriidae] and Pachycrepoideus vindemiae [Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae]) under different environmental soil conditions [J].
Guillén, L ;
Aluja, M ;
Equihua, M ;
Sivinski, J .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2002, 23 (03) :219-227
[5]   Dynamic effects of parasitism by an endoparasitoid wasp on the development of two host species: implications for host quality and parasitoid fitness [J].
Harvey, JA .
ECOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 2000, 25 (03) :267-278
[6]   Linear functional response by two pupal Drosophila parasitoids foraging within single or multiple patch environments [J].
Kacar, Gulay ;
Wang, Xin-Geng ;
Biondi, Antonio ;
Daane, Kent M. .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (08)
[7]   Wolbachia pipientisAssociated With Tephritid Fruit Fly Pests: From Basic Research to Applications [J].
Mateos, Mariana ;
Montoya, Humberto Martinez ;
Lanzavecchia, Silvia B. ;
Conte, Claudia ;
Guillen, Karina ;
Moran-Aceves, Brenda M. ;
Toledo, Jorge ;
Liedo, Pablo ;
Asimakis, Elias D. ;
Doudoumis, Vangelis ;
Kyritsis, Georgios A. ;
Papadopoulos, Nikos T. ;
Augustinos, Antonios A. ;
Segura, Diego F. ;
Tsiamis, George .
FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 11
[8]  
McGraw-Hill C., 2008, STATISTIX 8 1 ANAL S
[9]  
Montoya P., 2007, P661, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-6059-5_61
[10]  
Muhammad Naveed Muhammad Naveed, 2014, Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, V6, P1, DOI 10.5897/JABSD2013.0209