Influence of crop rotation and aggregate size on carbon dioxide production and denitritication

The influence of soil and crop management practices on soil aggregation is, well documented; however very little information is available on the impact of aggregation on biological processes such as greenhouse gas emissions. Soils (Ap horizon of a Brookston clay loam) were sampled in the spring of 2002 from two treatments in a long-term study (established in 1959). The treatments included continuous corn (Zea mays L.) and the corn phase of a 4-year crop rotation which included corn-oats (Avena sativa L.)-alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)-alfalfa. The continuous corn (CC) treatment was plowed every fall whereas the rotation corn (RC) treatment was plowed 2 out of the 4 years (in the fall following second year alfalfa and following corn). The objectives were to determine the impact of crop rotation and continuous corn on aggregate size distribution, and the influence of aggregate size on CO2 and N2O production through denitrification. The soil samples were separated into six aggregate size fractions (<0.25, 0.25-0.50, 0.50-1.0, 1.0-2.0, 2.0-4.0, and 4.0-8.0 mm diameter) using a dry sieving procedure. Each aggregate size fraction was separated into two subsamples with one subsample left intact and the other ground to <0.15 mm (100-mesh sieve). The intact and ground aggregates from each size fraction were incubated anaerobically using the acetylene inhibition technique and carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O) production (denitrification) were determined. Nitrate was added and thus no limiting in the incubations. In both cropping treatments, the 2-4 mm aggregate size was the dominant size fraction (similar to35-45% of the soil by weight) followed by the 1-2 mm size fraction (similar to20--25% of the soil by weight). Crop rotation increased both CO2 and N2O production (denitrification) and the proportion of <2 mm diameter aggregates compared to continuous corn. For intact aggregates, CO2 production decreased with increasing aggregate size, while N2O production (denitrification) increased with increasing aggregate size. When the aggregates were ground, CO2 production was independent of the original aggregate size, while N2O production (denitrification) decreased as the size of the original aggregates increased. This study demonstrates that both the size distribution of natural soil aggregates and soil grinding can have substantial impacts on the CO2 and N2O production through denitrification. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.