Effectiveness of Ultrasonography Guided Subclavian Catheterization

被引:1
作者
Kahraman, Abdullah [1 ]
Doganay, Guler Eraslan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Ataturk Chest Dis & Thorac Surg Training & Res Ho, Dept Intens Care, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Landmark; Out-of-plane technique; Subclavian vein; Ultrasonography; VEIN CANNULATION; ULTRASOUND; GUIDELINES; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.32592/ircmj.2022.24.10.1536
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Central venous catheterization (CVC) insertion is a prevalent invasive procedure performed in critical care patients. Although this procedure is considered to provide better patient comfort and a lower infection risk compared to other methods, it has a higher risk of complications, such as pneumothorax, arterial puncture, nerve injury, and bleeding. Ultrasonography (USG)-guided subclavian catheterization has recently become a popular technique. This study retrospectively analyzed 50 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who underwent infraclavicular subclavian catheterization with the out-of-plane technique under USG guidance. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of subclavian catheterization applied with the out-of-plane technique in the ICU. Methods: This retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent subclavian CVC insertion via the out-of-plane technique under USG guidance in the ICU between March and December 2020. Age, gender, height, weight, body mass index, admission to the ICU, use of anticoagulant and/or anti-aggregant medicine, and coagulation parameters were recorded for each patient. The success of the procedure, the number of attempts, and the duration of the procedure were scanned retrospectively from the records. Malposition and complications were monitored using USG throughout the procedure and chest radiographs after the procedure. Results: The 50 patients comprised 27 (54%) men and 23 (46%) women, with a mean age of 72.8 +/- 11.8 years. In all patients, subclavian CVC insertion was successfully performed under USG guidance via the out-of-plane technique. The mean procedural time was 220.90 +/- 60.20 sec. The procedure was completed in a single session for 27 (54%), two sessions for 22 (44%), and three sessions for 1 (2%) patient. Only one complication (pneumothorax) developed in one patient, who underwent tube thoracostomy. No catheter malposition was observed in other patients. Conclusion: USG-guided subclavian catheterization is a safe technique to be performed by experienced practitioners.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland: Safe vascular access 2016
    Bodenham, A.
    Babu, S.
    Bennett, J.
    Binks, R.
    Fee, P.
    Fox, B.
    Johnston, A. J.
    Klein, A. A.
    Langton, J. A.
    Mclure, H.
    Tighe, S. Q. M.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 71 (05) : 573 - 585
  • [2] Guidelines on the use of ultrasound guidance for vascular access
    Bouaziz, Herve
    Zetlaoui, Paul J.
    Pierre, Sebastien
    Desruennes, Eric
    Fritsch, Nicolas
    Jochum, Denis
    Lapostolle, Frederic
    Pirotte, Thierry
    Villiers, Stephane
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (01) : 65 - 69
  • [3] Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for subclavian or femoral vein catheterization
    Brass, Patrick
    Hellmich, Martin
    Kolodziej, Laurentius
    Schick, Guido
    Smith, Andrew F.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2015, (01):
  • [4] Cannulation of the subclavian vein using real-time ultrasound guidance
    Davies, Thomas W.
    Montgomery, Hugh
    Gilbert-Kawai, Edward
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY, 2020, 21 (04) : 349 - 354
  • [5] Eisen Lewis A, 2006, J Intensive Care Med, V21, P40, DOI 10.1177/0885066605280884
  • [6] Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: A prospective randomized study
    Fragou, Mariantina
    Gravvanis, Andreas
    Dimitriou, Vasilios
    Papalois, Apostolos
    Kouraklis, Gregorios
    Karabinis, Andreas
    Saranteas, Theodosios
    Poularas, John
    Papanikolaou, John
    Davlouros, Periklis
    Labropoulos, Nicos
    Karakitsos, Dimitrios
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (07) : 1607 - 1612
  • [7] Clinical guidelines on central venous catheterisation
    Frykholm, P.
    Pikwer, A.
    Hammarskjold, F.
    Larsson, A. T.
    Lindgren, S.
    Lindwall, R.
    Taxbro, K.
    Oberg, F.
    Acosta, S.
    Akeson, J.
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2014, 58 (05) : 508 - 524
  • [8] Complications of central venous catheterization
    Kusminsky, Roberto E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2007, 204 (04) : 681 - 696
  • [9] Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Fayad, Ashraf
    Ahmed, Osman
    Bryson, Gregory L.
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Barron, Carly C.
    Sullivan, Patrick
    Thompson, Calvin
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (07) : 1498 - 1507
  • [10] Lanspa Michael J, 2014, Ann Am Thorac Soc, V11, P583, DOI 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-414BC