Moral Utilitarianism and Attitudes Toward Animals

被引:11
作者
Begue, Laurent [1 ]
Laine, Pierre-Jean [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Psychol Dept, Grenoble, France
[2] Dahu EURL, Grenoble, France
关键词
attitudes toward animals; utilitarianism; morality; decision making; psychology; trolley dilemma; PERSONALITY; JUDGMENTS; RESPONSES; EMPATHY; GENDER;
D O I
10.1080/10508422.2016.1162720
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The majority of studies investigating attitudes toward animals have underscored the role of demographic and personality factors. The study of the role of general moral worldviews on attitudes toward animals represents an important complementary perspective. In the current study, we analyzed the relationship between moral utilitarianism toward humans and attitudes toward animals. In psychological and neuroscientific studies, moral utilitarianism has been shown to be related to empathy deficits. We expected that utilitarian decision making would be related to the endorsement of an instrumental representation of animals. We measured utilitarianism with the trolley problem, a hypothetical moral dilemma widely used in the psychological study of moral reasoning. A sample of 20,474 French adults answered an online survey measuring attitudes toward animals and moral decision making involving human beings. Results showed that irrespective of participants' age and gender, there was a slight relationship between utilitarianism measured by the trolley dilemma and the endorsement of an instrumental representation of animal. Limitations and implications for future research are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 178
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANIMAL WELFARE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 7 SE PSYCH ASS NEW O
[3]   The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas [J].
Bartels, Daniel M. ;
Pizarro, David A. .
COGNITION, 2011, 121 (01) :154-161
[4]  
Bowd AlanD., 1989, Anthrozoos, V3, P20, DOI DOI 10.2752/089279390787057784
[5]   Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? [J].
Buhrmester, Michael ;
Kwang, Tracy ;
Gosling, Samuel D. .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 6 (01) :3-5
[6]   Decision making and testosterone: When the ends justify the means [J].
Carney, Dana R. ;
Mason, Malia F. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (04) :668-671
[7]  
Choe SY, 2011, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V6, P580
[8]   Deontological and Utilitarian Inclinations in Moral Decision Making: A Process Dissociation Approach [J].
Conway, Paul ;
Gawronski, Bertram .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 104 (02) :216-235
[9]   For Whom Do the Ends Justify the Means? Social Class and Utilitarian Moral Judgment [J].
Cote, Stephane ;
Piff, Paul K. ;
Willer, Robb .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 104 (03) :490-503
[10]   Serotonin selectively influences moral judgment and behavior through effects on harm aversion [J].
Crockett, Molly J. ;
Clark, Luke ;
Hauser, Marc D. ;
Robbins, Trevor W. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (40) :17433-17438