Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: A changing paradigm

被引:65
作者
Klotz, DA [1 ]
Winkle, MR [1 ]
Richmon, J [1 ]
Hengerer, AS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Div Otolaryngol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
epistaxis; nasal packing; embolization; nose bleed;
D O I
10.1097/00005537-200209000-00008
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective. To demonstrate that surgery, as the initial treatment option for posterior epistaxis, can provide comparable success and complication rates to nonsurgical management with fewer associated costs. Study Design: A retrospective chart review and cost analysis. Methods: Two hundred three consecutive charts were reviewed for patient outcome, complications, and hospitalization time. Average costs were calculated from hospital department and physician fee schedules. Results: Average success rate of all surgical procedures performed for posterior epistaxis was 90%, anterior-posterior packing success was 62%, and embolization success was 75%. The packing-only group had a significantly greater mean hospitalization time (5.29 d) than patients who were treated either surgically (2.1 d) or with embolization (2.6 d). The average per-patient admission charges were, for successful posterior packing, $5136 per patient; for surgical treatment, $3851 per patient; and for embolization, $5697 per patient. Surgery offered a cost savings of $1846 per patient over traditional packing. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the groups. Conclusion: The review suggests that a better success rate, a comparable complication rate, and a cost savings can be achieved with surgical intervention as the first-line treatment for intractable epistaxis when compared with traditional anterior-posterior packing and embolization.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1582
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条