Dynamic characteristics of chlorine dispersion process and quantitative risk assessment of pollution hazard

被引:7
作者
Xin, Baoquan [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Jianliang [1 ]
Dang, Wenyi [2 ]
Wan, Lu [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Chem Engn, Dalian 116024, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] SINOPEC Qingdao Res Inst Safety Engn, Qingdao 266101, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Chlorine; Pollution hazard; Dispersion; Dynamic characteristics; Quantitative risk assessment; Dense gas; POOL model; CLOUD DISPERSION; CFD PERFORMANCE; GAS DISPERSION; RELEASE; MODELS; SIMULATION; ACCIDENT; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-11864-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to analyze dispersion behavior characteristics and pollution hazard risk after a release of liquid chlorine. A full-scale model of liquid chlorine tanks in an area with a radius range of 3 km was established using FLACS (Flame Acceleration Simulator) code, and the chlorine dispersion characteristics of six leakage scenarios were calculated according to the POOL model, and the individual risk and social risk under different conditions as calculated quantitatively. The results show that leakage occurs in three stages: dynamic dispersion, gravity dispersion, and atmospheric dispersion. Variations in dispersion processes were expressed as "outward expansion" and "inward contraction." At the same time, dispersion was accompanied by the phenomenon of "cloud separation." In the six leakage scenarios, the total distance of chlorine dispersion was 84-1000 m for a concentration of 225 ppm, and 27.5-401.3 m for a concentration of 900 ppm. The corresponding times (duration) to the farthest dispersion distance were 235-1345 s and 185-680 s, respectively. Chlorine concentration and dispersion distance are consistent in trend; however, the farthest dispersion distance shows a "delay effect" in time. At 225 ppm and 900 ppm, the delay time was 125-1145 s and 75-480 s indifferent leakage scenarios. The installation of a safety instrument system (SIS) can effectively reduce the risk of chlorine dispersion.
引用
收藏
页码:46161 / 46175
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion [J].
Hansen, Olav R. ;
Gavelli, Filippo ;
Ichard, Mathieu ;
Davis, Scott G. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2010, 23 (06) :857-877
[12]   Assessment of chlorine leak dispersion around Gebeng industrial area and potential evacuation route [J].
Law, Woon Phui ;
Erain, Norliyana ;
Ramli, Noram Irwan ;
Gimbun, Jolius .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2019, 216 :117-129
[13]  
[李沁怡 Li Qinyi], 2012, [环境科学学报, Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae], V32, P537
[14]   Comparison of k-ε models in gaseous release and dispersion simulations using the CFD code FLACS [J].
Moen, Alexander ;
Mauri, Lorenzo ;
Narasimhamurthy, Vagesh D. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2019, 130 :306-316
[15]   Medium scale LNG-related experiments and CFD simulation of water curtain [J].
Olewski, Tomasz ;
Nayak, Subramanya ;
Basha, Omar ;
Waldram, Simon ;
Vechot, Luc .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2011, 24 (06) :798-804
[16]   Assessment of the consequences of accident scenarios involving dangerous substances [J].
Pintaric, Z. N. .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2007, 85 (B1) :23-38
[17]   Toxic release of chlorine and off-site emergency scenario - A case study [J].
Ruj, Biswajit ;
Chatterjee, Pradip Kumar .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2012, 25 (03) :650-653
[18]   Accidental release of chlorine in Chicago: Coupling of an exposure model with a Computational Fluid Dynamics model [J].
Sanchez, E. Y. ;
Colman Lerner, J. E. ;
Porta, A. ;
Jacovkis, P. M. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 64 :47-55
[19]   Modeling and simulation of dense cloud dispersion in urban areas by means of computational fluid dynamics [J].
Scargiali, F. ;
Grisafi, F. ;
Busciglio, A. ;
Brucato, A. .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2011, 197 :285-293
[20]   Experimental data and CFD performance for CO2 cloud dispersion analysis [J].
Schleder, A. M. ;
Martins, M. R. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2016, 43 :688-699