Two-year Follow-up After Decompressive Surgery With and Without Implantation of an Interspinous Device for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis A Prospective Controlled Study

被引:34
作者
Richter, Alexander [1 ]
Halm, Henry F. H. [2 ,3 ]
Hauck, Michael [4 ]
Quante, Markus [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Asklepios Klin St Georg, Spine Ctr Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Klinikum Neustadt, Dept Spine Surg, D-23730 Neustadt, Germany
[3] Klinikum Neustadt, Scoliosis Ctr, D-23730 Neustadt, Germany
[4] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Neurol, Hamburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 27卷 / 06期
关键词
interspinous process device; Coflex device; lumbar dynamic stabilization; lumbar spinal stenosis; decompression surgery; INTERMITTENT NEUROGENIC CLAUDICATION; METAANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; INSTABILITY; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES; 10-YEAR; SPACER;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31825f7203
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Two-arm prospective controlled study. Objective: The aim of our study was to prospectively assess the outcome of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treated with decompressive surgery alone in comparison with additional implantation of the Coflex interspinous device. Summary of Backround Data: In symptomatic LSS, decompression surgery is an established treatment. Recently, a number of interspinous devices have been introduced as an alternative to conventional surgical procedures. The theoretical aim of the Coflex device is to unload the facet joints, restore foraminal height, and provide stability to improve the clinical outcome. Published information is limited, and there are no data that prove the superiority of the implant in comparison with traditional surgical approaches. Methods: Sixty-two patients with symptomatic LSS were treated with decompressive surgery; 31 of these patients received an additional Coflex device. Preoperatively and postoperatively, disability and pain scores were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale, and the pain-free walking distance. Patients underwent postoperative assessments at 3, 6, 12, and 24 month including the above-mentioned scores and patient satisfaction. Results: There was a significant improvement (P < 0.001) in the clinical outcome assessed in the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Visual Analog Scale, and the pain-free walking distance at all times of re-investigation compared with the base line in both groups. Up to 2 years after surgery, there were no significant differences between both groups in all ascertained parameters, including the patient satisfaction and subjective operation decision. Conclusions: The results of this first prospective controlled study indicate that the additional placement of a Coflex interspinous device does not improve the already good clinical outcome after decompressive surgery for LSS in the 24-month follow-up interval.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 341
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Lumbar spinal stenosis:: Conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study [J].
Amundsen, T ;
Weber, H ;
Nordal, HJ ;
Magnaes, B ;
Abdelnoor, M ;
Lilleås, F .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (11) :1424-1435
[2]   The outcome of spinal decompression surgery 5 years on [J].
Anjarwalla, N. K. ;
Brown, L. C. ;
McGregor, A. H. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (11) :1842-1847
[3]   Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study [J].
Atlas, SJ ;
Keller, RB ;
Wu, YA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Singer, DE .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) :936-943
[4]   The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain [J].
Cabraja, Mario ;
Abbushi, Alexander ;
Woiciechowsky, Christian ;
Kroppenstedt, Stefan .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (11) :1686-1694
[5]   Surgery for Low Back Pain A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Chou, Roger ;
Baisden, Jamie ;
Carragee, Eugene J. ;
Resnick, Daniel K. ;
Shaffer, William O. ;
Loeser, John D. .
SPINE, 2009, 34 (10) :1094-1109
[6]   LUMBAR ZYGAPOPHYSIAL (FACET) JOINT INJECTIONS [J].
DREYFUSS, PH ;
DREYER, SJ ;
HERRING, SA .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (18) :2040-2047
[7]   Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: Updated Cochrane Review [J].
Gibson, JNA ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (20) :2312-2320
[8]  
Kaech DL, 2002, SPINAL RESTABILIZATION PROCEDURES: DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION CAGES, ARTIFICIAL DISCS AND MOBILE IMPLANTS, P355
[9]   Can a modified interspinous spacer prevent instability in axial rotation and lateral bending? A biomechanical in vitro study resulting in a new idea [J].
Kettler, A. ;
Drumm, J. ;
Heuer, F. ;
Haeussler, K. ;
Mack, C. ;
Claes, L. ;
Wilke, H. -J. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2008, 23 (02) :242-247
[10]   One-year outcome evaluation after interspinous implantation for degenerative spinal stenosis with segmental instability [J].
Kong, Doo-Sik ;
Kim, Eun-Sang ;
Eoh, Whan .
JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2007, 22 (02) :330-335