Description and evaluation of the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (NMMB-MONARCH) version 1.0: gas-phase chemistry at global scale

被引:35
作者
Badia, Alba [1 ,10 ]
Jorba, Oriol [1 ]
Voulgarakis, Apostolos [2 ,3 ]
Dabdub, Donald
Perez Garcia-Pando, Carlos [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Hilboll, Andreas [6 ,7 ]
Goncalves, Maria [1 ,8 ]
Janjic, Zavisa [9 ]
机构
[1] Barcelona Supercomput Ctr, Dept Earth Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Phys, London, England
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Mech & Aerosp Engn, Irvine, CA USA
[4] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Appl Phys & Appl Math, New York, NY USA
[6] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys, Bremen, Germany
[7] Univ Bremen, MARUM Ctr Marine Environm Sci, Bremen, Germany
[8] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Project & Construct Engn Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[9] Natl Ctr Environm Predict, College Pk, MD USA
[10] Univ East Anglia, Ctr Ocean & Atmospher Sci, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
TROPOSPHERIC NITROGEN-DIOXIDE; CONVECTIVE ADJUSTMENT SCHEME; CHEMICAL-TRANSPORT MODEL; PEROXYACETYL NITRATE PAN; ISOPRENE EMISSIONS; RADIATIVE-TRANSFER; TECHNICAL NOTE; AIR-QUALITY; DUST MODEL; OZONE;
D O I
10.5194/gmd-10-609-2017
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper presents a comprehensive description and benchmark evaluation of the tropospheric gas-phase chemistry component of the Multiscale Online Nonhydrostatic AtmospheRe CHemistry model (NMMB-MONARCH), formerly known as NMMB/BSC-CTM, that can be run on both regional and global domains. Here, we provide an extensive evaluation of a global annual cycle simulation using a variety of background surface stations (EMEP, WDCGG and CASTNET), ozonesondes (WOUDC, CMD and SHADOZ), aircraft data (MOZAIC and several campaigns), and satellite observations (SCIAMACHY and MOPITT). We also include an extensive discussion of our results in comparison to other state-of-the-art models. We note that in this study, we omitted aerosol processes and some natural emissions (lightning and volcano emissions). The model shows a realistic oxidative capacity across the globe. The seasonal cycle for CO is fairly well represented at different locations (correlations around 0.3-0.7 in surface concentrations), although concentrations are underestimated in spring and winter in the Northern Hemisphere, and are overestimated throughout the year at 800 and 500 hPa in the Southern Hemisphere. Nitrogen species are well represented in almost all locations, particularly NO2 in Europe (root mean square error - RMSE - below 5 ppb). The modeled vertical distributions of NOx and HNO3 are in excellent agreement with the observed values and the spatial and seasonal trends of tropospheric NO2 columns correspond well to observations from SCIAMACHY, capturing the highly polluted areas and the biomass burning cycle throughout the year. Over Asia, the model underestimates NOx from March to August, probably due to an underestimation of NOx emissions in the region. Overall, the comparison of the modeled CO and NO2 with MOPITT and SCIAMACHY observations emphasizes the need for more accurate emission rates from anthropogenic and biomass burning sources (i.e., specification of temporal variability). The resulting ozone (O-3) burden (348 Tg) lies within the range of other state-of-the-art global atmospheric chemistry models. The model generally captures the spatial and seasonal trends of background surface O-3 and its vertical distribution. However, the model tends to overestimate O-3 throughout the troposphere in several stations. This may be attributed to an overestimation of CO concentration over the Southern Hemisphere leading to an excessive production of O-3 or to the lack of specific chemistry (e.g., halogen chemistry, aerosol chemistry). Overall, O-3 correlations range between 0.6 and 0.8 for daily mean values. The overall performance of the NMMB-MONARCH is comparable to that of other state-of-the-art global chemistry models.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 638
页数:30
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]   Global air quality and pollution [J].
Akimoto, H .
SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5651) :1716-1719
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GEOPH RES ABSTR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Ambient (outdoor) air pollution
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, JPL PUBLICATION
[5]  
Arakawa A., 1966, Journal of Computational Physics, V1, P119, DOI [DOI 10.1016/0021-9991(66)90015-5, /10.1016/0021-9991(66)90015-5]
[6]   Sensitivity of isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN to the time resolution of input climate data [J].
Ashworth, K. ;
Wild, O. ;
Hewitt, C. N. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (03) :1193-1201
[7]   Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry:: Volume I -: gas phase reactions of Ox, HOx, NOx and SOx species [J].
Atkinson, R ;
Baulch, DL ;
Cox, RA ;
Crowley, JN ;
Hampson, RF ;
Hynes, RG ;
Jenkin, ME ;
Rossi, MJ ;
Troe, J .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2004, 4 :1461-1738
[8]   The Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) Experiment: Introduction [J].
Atlas, EL ;
Ridley, BA ;
Cantrell, CA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D4)
[9]   Gas-phase evaluation of the online NMMB/BSC-CTM model over Europe for 2010 in the framework of the AQMEII-Phase2 project [J].
Badia, A. ;
Jorba, O. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 115 :657-669
[10]   Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects [J].
Baklanov, A. ;
Schluenzen, K. ;
Suppan, P. ;
Baldasano, J. ;
Brunner, D. ;
Aksoyoglu, S. ;
Carmichael, G. ;
Douros, J. ;
Flemming, J. ;
Forkel, R. ;
Galmarini, S. ;
Gauss, M. ;
Grell, G. ;
Hirtl, M. ;
Joffre, S. ;
Jorba, O. ;
Kaas, E. ;
Kaasik, M. ;
Kallos, G. ;
Kong, X. ;
Korsholm, U. ;
Kurganskiy, A. ;
Kushta, J. ;
Lohmann, U. ;
Mahura, A. ;
Manders-Groot, A. ;
Maurizi, A. ;
Moussiopoulos, N. ;
Rao, S. T. ;
Savage, N. ;
Seigneur, C. ;
Sokhi, R. S. ;
Solazzo, E. ;
Solomos, S. ;
Sorensen, B. ;
Tsegas, G. ;
Vignati, E. ;
Vogel, B. ;
Zhang, Y. .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2014, 14 (01) :317-398