Estimation and Evidence in Forensic Anthropology: Sex and Race

被引:68
作者
Konigsberg, Lyle W. [1 ]
Algee-Hewitt, Bridget F. B. [2 ]
Steadman, Dawnie Wolfe [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Anthropol, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Anthropol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[3] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Anthropol, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
关键词
discriminant function; model-based clustering; likelihood ratio; craniometrics; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; IDENTIFICATION; CRANIA; MISCLASSIFICATION; APPORTIONMENT; ASSUMPTIONS; DIVERSITY; GENETICS; PACIFIC; STATURE;
D O I
10.1002/ajpa.20934
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Forensic anthropology typically uses osteological and/or dental data either to estimate characteristics of unidentified individuals or to serve as evidence in cases where there is a putative identification. In the estimation context, the problem is to describe aspects of an individual that may lead to their eventual identification, whereas in the evidentiary context, the problem is to provide the relative support for the identification. In either context, individual characteristics such as sex and race may be useful. Using a previously published forensic case (Steadman et al. (2006) Am J Phys Anthropol 131:15-26) and a large (N = 3,167) reference sample, we show that the sex of the individual can be reliably estimated using a small set of 11 craniometric variables. The likelihood ratio from sex (assuming a 1:1 sex ratio for the "population at large") is, however, relatively uninformative in "making" the identification. Similarly, the known "race" of the individual is relatively uninformative in "making" the identification, because the individual was recovered from an area where the 2000 US census provides a very homogenous picture of (self-identified) race. Of interest in this analysis is the fact that the individual, who was recovered from Eastern Iowa, classifies very clearly with [Howells 1973. Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference Among Recent Human Populations. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology; 1989. Skull Shape and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press]. Easter Islander sample in an analysis with uninformative priors. When the Iowa 2000 Census data on self-reported race are used for informative priors, the individual is clearly identified as "American White." This analysis shows the extreme importance of an informative prior in any forensic application. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:77-90, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 90
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
[11]   Races of Homo sapiens:: if not in the southwest Pacific, then nowhere [J].
Bulbeck, D ;
Raghavan, P ;
Rayner, D .
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY, 2006, 38 (01) :109-132
[12]   CANONICAL AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS OF SHAPE [J].
DARROCH, JN ;
MOSIMANN, JE .
BIOMETRIKA, 1985, 72 (02) :241-252
[13]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
LAIRD, NM ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01) :1-38
[14]  
Edgar HJH, 2005, J FORENSIC SCI, V50, P269
[15]   Human genetic diversity: Lewontin's fallacy [J].
Edwards, AWF .
BIOESSAYS, 2003, 25 (08) :798-801
[16]  
Feng ZD, 1996, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V58, P609
[17]   How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis [J].
Fraley, C ;
Raftery, AE .
COMPUTER JOURNAL, 1998, 41 (08) :578-588
[18]   Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation [J].
Fraley, C ;
Raftery, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (458) :611-631
[19]   Enhanced model-based clustering, density estimation, and discriminant analysis software: MCLUST [J].
Fraley, C ;
Raftery, AE .
JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 2003, 20 (02) :263-286
[20]   MCLUST: Software for model-based cluster analysis [J].
Fraley, C ;
Raftery, AE .
JOURNAL OF CLASSIFICATION, 1999, 16 (02) :297-306