Limitations of Embryo Selection Methods

被引:25
作者
Wong, Kai Mee [1 ]
Repping, Sjoerd [1 ]
Mastenbroek, Sebastiaan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Ctr Reprod Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
assisted reproduction; embryo transfer; embryo selection; cryopreservation; IVF outcome; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; WHOLE GENOME AMPLIFICATION; OVARIAN STIMULATION; PYRUVATE UPTAKE; HUMAN OOCYTES; NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1363554
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In in vitro fertilization (IVF), the selection of embryos for transfer is generally based on the morphology of the available embryos. However, not all embryos with good morphology implant and on average only one in four treatments are successful. This has driven a quest for alternative selection methods. The best known alternative selection method is preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), which has been used for over a decade before it was shown to be inferior to morphological selection. Now, new forms of PGS (performing biopsy at another stage of development and new methods for analysis) are emerging, just like alternative noninvasive embryo selection methods. However, the concept that better selection will lead to improved IVF results is not so certain anymore. Evidence is accumulating that all available embryos in an IVF cycle can be cryopreserved and transferred in subsequent cycles without impairing pregnancy rates or maybe even with an improvement in pregnancy rates. Embryo selection will then no longer be able to improve the live birth rate in IVF; it could even lower the live birth rate. Embryo selection will only be able to improve the time to pregnancy, if embryos with the highest implantation potential are transferred first.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 133
页数:7
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
AbdelHafez, Faten F. ;
Desai, Nina ;
Abou-Setta, Ahmed M. ;
Falcone, Tommaso ;
Goldfarb, James .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2010, 20 (02) :209-222
[2]   RETRACTED: Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial (Retracted article. See vol. 30, pg. 1245, 2013) [J].
Aflatoonian, Abbas ;
Oskouian, Homa ;
Ahmadi, Shahnaz ;
Oskouian, Leila .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2010, 27 (07) :357-363
[3]  
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, 2011, Hum Reprod, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1093/humrep/der037
[4]   Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF [J].
Baart, EB ;
Martini, E ;
van den Berg, I ;
Macklon, NS ;
Galjaard, RJH ;
Fauser, BCJM ;
Van Opstal, D .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (01) :223-233
[5]   Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover [J].
Brison, DR ;
Houghton, FD ;
Falconer, D ;
Roberts, SA ;
Hawkhead, J ;
Humpherson, PG ;
Lieberman, BA ;
Leese, HJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (10) :2319-2324
[6]   Sequential comprehensive chromosome analysis on polar bodies, blastomeres and trophoblast: insights into female meiotic errors and chromosomal segregation in the preimplantation window of embryo development [J].
Capalbo, Antonio ;
Bono, Sara ;
Spizzichino, Letizia ;
Biricik, Anil ;
Baldi, Marina ;
Colamaria, Silvia ;
Ubaldi, Filippo Maria ;
Rienzi, Laura ;
Fiorentino, Francesco .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (02) :509-518
[7]  
CDC. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010, REPR HLTH ASS REPR T
[8]   Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation adversely affects implantation following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer [J].
Check, JH ;
Choe, JK ;
Katsoff, D ;
Summers-Chase, D ;
Wilson, C .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1999, 16 (08) :416-420
[9]   Evaluation of the mechanism for higher pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients by comparison of fresh with frozen embryo transfer pregnancy rates in a shared oocyte programme [J].
Check, JH ;
OShaughnessy, A ;
Lurie, D ;
Fisher, C ;
Adelson, HG .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (11) :3022-3027
[10]   Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates [J].
Cohen, Jacques ;
Wells, Dagan ;
Munne, Santiago .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (03) :496-503