Coopetition and product innovation performance: The role of internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms

被引:216
作者
Estrada, Isabel [1 ]
Faems, Dries [1 ]
de Faria, Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Innovat Management & Strategy, NL-9700 AB Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Coopetition; Product innovation; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge protection; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; CO-OPETITION; INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK; DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCES; RADICAL INNOVATION; MANAGING KNOWLEDGE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; COOPERATION; COMPETITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.11.013
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Coopetition is an important new product development strategy; yet, studies addressing the impact of collaboration with competitors on product innovation performance provide mixed evidence. Conducting Tobit analyses on a sample of 627 manufacturing firms that responded to the fifth wave of the Flemish Community Innovation Survey, we find that the innovation performance implications of competitor collaboration depend on fine-grained intra-organizational design characteristics. In particular, our results show that competitor collaboration has a significant positive impact on product innovation performance only when internal knowledge sharing mechanisms and formal knowledge protection mechanisms are present. These findings contribute to the emerging contingency perspective on coopetition and provide specific recommendations to managers that are involved in coopetitive endeavors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 65
页数:10
相关论文
共 105 条
[91]   Internal capabilities, network resources and appropriation mechanisms as determinants of R&D outsourcing [J].
Spithoven, Andre ;
Teirlinck, Peter .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :711-725
[92]   Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm [J].
Szulanski, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :27-43
[93]   Who co-operates for innovation, and why - An empirical analysis [J].
Tether, BS .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2002, 31 (06) :947-967
[94]   Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance [J].
Tsai, WP .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2001, 44 (05) :996-1004
[95]  
TUSHMAN ML, 1981, ACAD MANAGE J, V24, P289, DOI 10.5465/255842
[96]   Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation [J].
Verona, G ;
Ravasi, D .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2003, 12 (03) :577-606
[97]  
Walter S., 2014, J PRODUCT INNOVATION
[98]   Value Creation in Alliance Portfolios: The Benefits and Costs of Network Resource Interdependencies [J].
Wassmer, Ulrich ;
Dussauge, Pierre .
EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 8 (01) :47-64
[99]   COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC-ORGANIZATION - THE ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE STRUCTURAL ALTERNATIVES [J].
WILLIAMSON, OE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1991, 36 (02) :269-296
[100]  
Wooldridge J. M., 2001, ECONOMETRIC ANAL CRO