Quality Assessment of Protein Structure Models

被引:45
作者
Kihara, Daisuke [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, Hao [1 ]
Yang, Yifeng David [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Coll Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Coll Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Markey Ctr Struct Biol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Protein structure prediction; homology modeling; error estimation; quality assessment; RMSD; MQAP; model quality assessment program; SITE-DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; PREDICTING RELIABLE REGIONS; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; FOLD-RECOGNITION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL POTENTIALS; HOMOLOGY MODELS; LOW-RESOLUTION; MEAN FORCE; 3-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES;
D O I
10.2174/138920309788452173
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Computational protein tertiary structure prediction has made significant progress over the last decade due to the advancement of techniques and the growth of sequence and structure databases. However, it is still not very easy to predict the accuracy of a given predicted structure. Predicting the accuracy, or quality assessment of a prediction model, is crucial for a practical use of the model such as biochemical experimental design and drug design. Recently several model quality assessment programs (MQAPs) have been proposed for assessing global and local accuracy of predicted structures. We will start with reviewing the current status of protein structure prediction methods with an emphasis on the source of errors. Then existing MQAPs are classified into several categories and each is discussed. The categories include methods which evaluate the quality of template-target alignments, those which evaluate stereochemical irregularities of prediction models, and methods which integrate several features into a composite quality assessment score.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 228
页数:13
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]   Protein structure prediction [J].
Al-Lazikani, B ;
Jung, J ;
Xiang, ZX ;
Honig, B .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (01) :51-56
[2]   Simple consensus procedures are effective and sufficient in secondary structure prediction [J].
Albrecht, M ;
Tosatto, SCE ;
Lengauer, T ;
Valle, G .
PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 2003, 16 (07) :459-462
[3]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[4]  
ALTSCHUL SF, 1990, J MOL BIOL, V215, P403, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
[5]  
[Anonymous], NUCL ACIDS RES
[6]   Second-site suppression of a nonfunctional mutation within the Leishmania donovani inosine-guanosine transporter [J].
Arastu-Kapur, S ;
Arendt, CS ;
Purnat, T ;
Carter, NS ;
Ullman, B .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 280 (03) :2213-2219
[7]   Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity [J].
Ashworth, Justin ;
Havranek, James J. ;
Duarte, Carlos M. ;
Sussman, Django ;
Monnat, Raymond J., Jr. ;
Stoddard, Barry L. ;
Baker, David .
NATURE, 2006, 441 (7093) :656-659
[8]   Protein structure prediction and structural genomics [J].
Baker, D ;
Sali, A .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5540) :93-96
[9]   Design of drug-resistant alleles of type-III phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases using mutagenesis and molecular modeling [J].
Balla, Andras ;
Tuymetova, Galina ;
Toth, Balazs ;
Szentpetery, Zsofia ;
Zhao, Xiaohang ;
Knight, Zachary A. ;
Shokat, Kevan ;
Steinbach, Peter J. ;
Balla, Tamas .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 47 (06) :1599-1607
[10]   Mapping the UDP-glucuronic acid binding site in UDP-glucuronosyltransferase-1A10 by homology-based modeling: Confirmation with biochemical evidence [J].
Banerjee, Rajat ;
Pennington, Matthew W. ;
Garza, Amanda ;
Owens, Ida S. .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 47 (28) :7385-7392