Writing groups as transformative spaces

被引:20
作者
Wilmot, Kirstin [1 ,2 ]
McKenna, Sioux [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhodes Univ, Ctr Postgrad Studies, Grahamstown, South Africa
[2] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Academic literacies; academic writing; curriculum transformation; peer learning; personal transformation; postgraduates; writing groups; ACADEMIC LITERACIES; PUBLICATION;
D O I
10.1080/07294360.2018.1450361
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Curriculum transformation is a central concern for higher education in response to rapidly expanding technologies, globalisation and the widening diversity of the student and staff body. This is particularly true for South Africa, which is still grappling with inequalities and pressure for social redress in its universities. Early responses to supporting students took the form of add-on, deficit-model' approaches which understood poor student retention and success rates as emerging from students' lack of neutral literacy skills'. Recent initiatives have begun to adopt more socio-cultural understandings of literacy that seek to challenge traditional power structures and cultivate horizontal peer-orientated spaces for learning with a focus on practice rather than on product. Writing groups, as spaces for academic writing development, embrace this orientation and are argued to provide a transformative framework that foregrounds proactive student learning and experience, while still accommodating disciplinary learning through peer engagement. Drawing on the successful implementation of such forms of support at a research-intensive university, this paper argues that writing groups can play a critical role in both personal (student) transformation and broader curriculum transformation. Data include anonymous questionnaires and surveys with participants and coordinators of the writing groups. An inductive, constant comparative analysis indicated that students feel empowered in this space to develop not only their writing practices but also their transforming identities as scholars. Writing groups were found to provide safe spaces' where academic practices can be made explicit and where they can be challenged. The paper therefore argues that writing groups can play a small but key role in broader transformation efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 882
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Research writing: problems and pedagogies [J].
Aitchison, Claire ;
Lee, Alison .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 11 (03) :265-278
[2]   From speed dating to intimacy: methodological change in the evaluation of a writing group [J].
不详 .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 33 (04) :635-648
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, J APPL LINGUIST, DOI DOI 10.1558/JAPL.V4I1.5
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, THESIS RHODES U
[5]  
[Anonymous], J LANGUAGE TEACHING
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WRITING QUALITATIVE
[7]  
[Anonymous], WRITING QUALITATIVE
[8]  
[Anonymous], STUDENT POLITICS AFR
[9]  
[Anonymous], S AFR HIGH ED REV 2
[10]   'Peer learning' as pedagogic discourse for research education [J].
Boud, D ;
Lee, A .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2005, 30 (05) :501-516