Technological capabilities for innovation activities across Europe: Evidence from wind, solar and bioenergy technologies

被引:26
作者
Corsatea, Teodora Diana [1 ]
机构
[1] JRC Inst Energy & Transport, Petten, Netherlands
关键词
Technological capabilities; Composite indicator; Innovation patterns; Renewable energy technologies; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INDICATORS; SPILLOVERS; FIRMS; OPPORTUNITY; DIFFUSION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.067
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper contributes to the development of renewable energy innovation metrics through an exploration of innovation patterns across the European countries in 2010. The identified localized innovation capabilities describe the health of the wind, solar and bioenergy sectors, highlighting a concentrated RES innovation activity within four countries: Germany, France, United Kingdom and Denmark. The association of technological capabilities along the innovation composite indicators allows the extraction of useful insights of the role of environmental policies on employment and technological change. Briefly, the corporate research investment per patent is lower for wind energy (EUR 0.61 million) and higher for PV and biofuels (approximately EUR 1 million). Important lever of innovation capabilities across Europe is identified within public support to deployment, which provides significant insights in terms of economic efficiency of generation technologies; the investigation finds job ratios which are higher for wind and lower for PV technology. As the evolution of the market drives the patterns of innovation activities for all selected technologies, considerable financial consequences are identified in the context of delocalization of clean technology manufacturers. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 479
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
[11]  
Breyer C, 2011, P IEEE INT EN C EXH, DOI 10.1109/ENERGYCON.2010.5771744
[12]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[13]   Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index [J].
Cherchye, L. ;
Moesen, W. ;
Rogge, N. ;
Van Puyenbroeck, T. ;
Saisana, M. ;
Saltelli, A. ;
Liska, R. ;
Tarantola, S. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (02) :239-251
[14]  
Consulting McKinsey, 2006, OPERATIONAL RES SOC, V59, P239
[15]   Indicators for assessing socioeconomic sustainability of bioenergy systems: A short list of practical measures [J].
Dale, Virginia H. ;
Efroymson, Rebecca A. ;
Kline, Keith L. ;
Langholtz, Matthew H. ;
Leiby, Paul N. ;
Oladosu, Gbadebo A. ;
Davis, Maggie R. ;
Downing, Mark E. ;
Hilliard, Michael R. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 26 :87-102
[16]  
EUROBSERV'ER, 2010, WIND EN BAR
[17]  
European Commission, 2003, 20025 EUR EN
[18]   The Patterns of Technological Capabilities of Countries: A Dual Approach using Composite Indicators and Data Envelopment Analysis [J].
Filippetti, Andrea ;
Peyrache, Antonio .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 39 (07) :1108-1121
[19]   PATENT STATISTICS AS ECONOMIC INDICATORS - A SURVEY [J].
GRILICHES, Z .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 1990, 28 (04) :1661-1707
[20]  
Grupp H, 2004, HANDBOOK OF QUANTITATIVE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH: THE USE OF PUBLICATION AND PATENT STATISTICS IN STUDIES OF S&T SYSTEMS, P75