The challenges of delivering validated personas for medical equipment design

被引:32
作者
Vincent, Christopher James [1 ]
Blandford, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCLIC, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Interface; Multidisciplinary communication; Medical device design; ERGONOMICS; SUPPORT; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.apergo.2014.01.010
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Representations of archetypal users (personas) have been advocated as a way to avoid designing in isolation. They allow communication of user needs and orient teams towards user experience. One of the challenges for developers of interactive medical devices is that most devices are used by a wide variety of people, and that developers have limited access to those people; personas have the potential to make developers more aware of who they are designing for. But this raises the question of whether it is possible to deliver useful, valid personas of interactive medical device users. The aim of this research was to develop and test a rigorous, empirically grounded process of constructing personas, with the objective of reflecting on that process. Many challenges were encountered: we found that directly linking the personas to a user population was not possible and although personas were a useful tool for supporting communication and elicitation across disciplines, it was hard to make them representative when picking details that were relevant and checking accuracy. Checking the content resulted in disparate, possibly incommensurable, views. Despite this, the personas proved useful in supporting the transfer of knowledge across professional perspectives. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd and The Ergonomics Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1097 / 1105
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Adlin Tamara., 2010, ESSENTIAL PERSONA LI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, HE75 HUM FACT ENG DE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 62366 IEC
[4]  
Björndal P, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6769, P378, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21675-6_44
[5]  
Blandford A, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3941, P26
[6]  
Blomquist A., 2002, P 2 NORD C HUM COMP, P197, DOI DOI 10.1145/572020.572044
[7]  
Bodker S., 2012, PDC'12 Proceedings of the 12th Participatory Design Conference 2012, P91, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1145/2347635.2347649, DOI 10.1145/2347635.2347649]
[8]  
Busch Marc, 2013, Trust and Trustworthy Computing. 6th International Conference, TRUST 2013. Proceedings: LNCS 7904, P223, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-38908-5_17
[9]  
Chapman C.N., 2006, P HUMAN FACTORS ERGO, V50, P634, DOI DOI 10.1177/154193120605000503
[10]  
Cooper A., 2000, INTERVIEW PUBLISHED