Helicity of magnetic clouds and their associated active regions

被引:67
作者
Leamon, RJ
Canfield, RC
Jones, SL
Lambkin, K
Lundberg, BJ
Pevtsov, AA
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Phys & Astron, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Dublin, Expt Phys Dept, Dublin 4, Ireland
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Phys, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[4] Natl Solar Observ, Sunspot, NM 88349 USA
关键词
magnetic clouds; active regions; electric currents; solar eruptions; magnetic helicity;
D O I
10.1029/2003JA010324
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In this work we relate the magnetic and topological parameters of twelve interplanetary magnetic clouds to associated solar active regions. We use a cylindrically symmetric constant-alpha force-free model to derive field line twist, total current, and total magnetic flux from in situ observations of magnetic clouds. We compare these properties with those of the associated solar active regions, which we infer from solar vector magnetograms. Our comparison of fluxes and currents reveals: (1) the total flux ratios Phi(MC)/Phi(AR) tend to be of order unity, (2) the total current ratios I-MC/I-AR are orders of magnitude smaller, and (3) there is a statistically significant proportionality between them. Our key findings in comparing total twists alphaL are that (1) the values of (alphaL)(MC) are typically an order of magnitude greater than those of (alphaL)(AR) and (2) there is no statistically significant sign or amplitude relationship between them. These findings compel us to believe that magnetic clouds associated with active region eruptions are formed by magnetic reconnection between these regions and their larger-scale surroundings, rather than simple eruption of preexisting structures in the corona or chromosphere.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] New formulae for magnetic relative helicity and field line helicity
    Aly, Jean-Jacques
    FLUID DYNAMICS RESEARCH, 2018, 50 (01)
  • [32] Development of Forbush Decreases Associated with Coronal Ejections from Active Regions and non-Active Regions
    Melkumyan, A. A.
    Belov, A. V.
    Abunina, M. A.
    Shlyk, N. S.
    Abunin, A. A.
    Oleneva, V. A.
    Yanke, V. G.
    GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2022, 62 (SUPPL 1) : S40 - S53
  • [33] Solar activity due to magnetic complexity of active regions
    Schmieder, Brigitte
    Mandrini, Cristina
    Chandra, Ramesh
    Demoulin, Pascal
    Toeroek, Tibor
    Pariat, Etienne
    Uddin, Wahab
    PHYSICS OF SUN AND STAR SPOTS, 2011, (273): : 164 - 168
  • [34] Helioseismology, Dynamo, and Magnetic Helicity
    Sakurai, Takashi
    PROGRESS IN SOLAR/STELLAR PHYSICS WITH HELIO- AND ASTEROSEISMOLOGY, 2012, 462 : 247 - 260
  • [35] Magnetic Helicity, Tilt, and Twist
    Pevtsov, Alexei A.
    Berger, Mitchell A.
    Nindos, Alexander
    Norton, Aimee A.
    van Driel-Gesztelyi, Lidia
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2014, 186 (1-4) : 285 - 324
  • [36] Helicity conservation in magnetic reconnection
    Hu, YQ
    Xia, LD
    Li, X
    Wang, JX
    Al, GX
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 1997, 42 (05): : 398 - 402
  • [37] Magnetic helicity and the solar dynamo
    Brandenburg, A
    Blackman, EG
    SOLAR VARIABILITY: FROM CORE TO OUTER FRONTIERS, VOLS 1 & 2, 2002, 506 : 805 - 810
  • [38] Helicity conservation in magnetic reconnection
    HUYouqiu
    2. Beijing Astronomical Observatory
    ChineseScienceBulletin, 1997, (05) : 398 - 402
  • [39] Photospheric Magnetic Free Energy Density of Solar Active Regions
    Zhang, Hongqi
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2016, 291 (12) : 3501 - 3517
  • [40] Correlation Functions of Photospheric Magnetic Fields in Solar Active Regions
    Valentina Abramenko
    Regina Suleymanova
    Solar Physics, 2024, 299