Optimizing the hybrid capture II human papillomavirus test to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

被引:44
|
作者
Howard, M
Sellors, J
Kaczorowski, J
机构
[1] Program Appropriate Technol Hlth, Seattle, WA 98107 USA
[2] St Josephs Hosp, Father Sean OSullivan Res Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Family Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2002年 / 100卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02315-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the optimal relative light unit ratio, and correspondingly viral load, of the hybrid capture II oncogenic human papillomavirus deoxyribonudeic add test for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). METHODS: Women with abnormal cytology were referred for colposcopy, and a cervical swab or brush specimen was obtained for human papillomavirus testing. Sensitivities, specificities, and likelihood ratios of different relative light unit ratio cutoffs were calculated using a reference standard of colposcopy or biopsy of either CIN II+ (CIN II, III, or carcinoma), or CIN I+ (CIN I, CIN II+). The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to estimate optimal test-positive cutoff points for the hybrid capture II test. RESULTS: CIN II+ was found in 18.7% (98 of 524) and CIN I in 10.5% (55 of 524) of the women. The optimal relative light unit ratio was 15.56, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 82.7% and 73.2% for CIN II+, and 74.2% and 77.8% for CIN I+. In a stratified analysis, a higher relative light unit cutoff (15.19) optimized sensitivity and specificity for CIN II+ (sensitivity 81.8%, specificity 51.5%) for women with low-grade squamous intraepithelial. lesions cytology, whereas the optimal cutoff was 2.36 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 73.0%) for women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance, yielding referral rates of 53.3% and 28.7%, respectively. Use of a swab or brush was not associated with the level of human papillomavirus detected (P > .05). CONCLUSION: Use of a higher cutoff for the relative light unit ratio (higher viral load) of the hybrid capture II test may improve the management of women, especially those with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions cytology.
引用
收藏
页码:972 / 980
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS AND CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    LUTHI, TE
    BURK, RD
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (22) : 1868 - 1868
  • [2] Test Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus in Urine for Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Rohner, Eliane
    Rahangdale, Lisa
    Sanusi, Busola
    Knittel, Andrea K.
    Vaughan, Laurence
    Chesko, Kirsty
    Faherty, Brian
    Tulenko, Samantha E.
    Schmitt, John W.
    Romocki, LaHoma S.
    Sivaraman, Vijay
    Nelson, Julie A. E.
    Smith, Jennifer S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (03)
  • [3] Comparison between the hybrid capture II test and a PCR-based human papillomavirus detection method for diagnosis and posttreatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Söderlund-Strand, A
    Rymark, P
    Andersson, P
    Dillner, J
    Dillner, L
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (07) : 3260 - 3266
  • [4] Human papillomavirus detection in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by the second-generation hybrid capture microplate test, comparing two different cervical specimen collection methods
    Nindl, I
    Lorincz, A
    Mielzynska, I
    Petry, U
    Baur, S
    Kirchmayr, R
    Michels, W
    Schneider, A
    CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC VIROLOGY, 1998, 10 (01): : 49 - 56
  • [5] Human papillomavirus types in cervical infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
    Stefanescu, C. D.
    Calistru, P. I.
    Gherlan, G. S.
    Gherlan, I.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2015, 467 : S113 - S114
  • [6] Improved rate of high-grade cervical Intraepithelial neoplasia detection in human papillomavirus DNA hybrid capture testing
    Proca, Daniela M.
    Williams, JoAnna D.
    Rofagha, Soraya
    Tranovich, Virginia L.
    Keyhani-Rofagha, Sedigheh
    ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY, 2007, 29 (04): : 264 - 270
  • [7] SQUAMOUS INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN AN OVARIAN-CYST, CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA, AND HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS
    SWORN, MJ
    JONES, H
    LETCHWORTH, AT
    HERRINGTON, CS
    MCGEE, JOD
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1995, 26 (03) : 344 - 347
  • [8] EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA - THE ROLE OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS
    COX, JT
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 9 (01): : 1 - 37
  • [9] ASSOCIATION OF HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION WITH CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    GRUNEBAUM, AN
    SEDLIS, A
    SILLMAN, F
    FRUCHTER, R
    STANEK, A
    BOYCE, J
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1983, 62 (04): : 448 - 455
  • [10] PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION AND CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    BOYLE, C
    LOWELL, D
    LIVOLSI, V
    KELSEY, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1985, 122 (03) : 546 - 547