Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open) A Systematic Overview of Reviews

被引:147
作者
Muaddi, Hala [1 ]
El Hafid, Melanie [1 ]
Choi, Woo Jin [1 ]
Lillie, Erin [2 ]
de Mestral, Charles [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Nathens, Avery [1 ,3 ,4 ,6 ]
Stukel, Therese A. [4 ,6 ]
Karanicolas, Paul J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Gen Surg, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Sunnybrook Res Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Gen Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Div Vasc Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
minimally invasive surgery; robotic surgery; surgical innovation;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Describe clinical outcomes (eg, postoperative complications, survival) after robotic surgery compared to open or laparoscopic surgery. Background: Robotic surgery utilization has increased over the years across a wide range of surgical procedures. However, evidence supporting improved clinical outcomes after robotic surgery is limited. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of systematic reviews from inception to January 2019 for systematic reviews describing postoperative outcomes after robotic surgery. We qualitatively described patient outcomes of commonly performed robotic procedures: radical prostatectomy, hysterectomy, lobectomy, thymectomy, rectal resection, partial nephrectomy, distal gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, hepatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and cholecystectomy. Results: One hundred fifty-four systematic reviews included 336 studies and 18 randomized controlled trials reporting on patient outcomes after robotic compared to laparoscopic or open procedures. Data from the randomized controlled trials demonstrate that robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy offered fewer biochemical recurrence and improvement in quality of recovery and pain scores only up to 6 weeks postoperatively compared to open radical prostatectomy. When compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy, robotic surgery offered improved urinary and sexual functions. Robotic surgery for endometrial cancer had fewer conversion to open compared to laparoscopic. Otherwise, robotic surgery outcomes were similar to conventional surgical approaches for other procedures except for radical hysterectomy where minimally invasive approaches may result in patient harm compared to open approach. Conclusion: Robotic surgery has been widely incorporated into practise despite limited supporting evidence. More rigorous research focused on patient-important benefits is needed before further expansion of robotic surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 473
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials [J].
Albright, Benjamin B. ;
Witte, Tilman ;
Tofte, Alena N. ;
Chou, Jeremy ;
Black, Jonathan D. ;
Desai, Vrunda B. ;
Erekson, Elisabeth A. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (01) :18-27
[2]   Randomized Comparison between Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Asimakopoulos, Anastasios D. ;
Fraga, Clovis T. Pereira ;
Annino, Filippo ;
Pasqualetti, Patrizio ;
Calado, Adriano A. ;
Mugnier, Camille .
JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (05) :1503-1512
[3]   Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excison of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial [J].
Baik, S. H. ;
Ko, Y. T. ;
Kang, C. M. ;
Lee, W. J. ;
Kim, N. K. ;
Sohn, S. K. ;
Chi, H. S. ;
Cho, C. H. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2008, 22 (07) :1601-1608
[4]   Surgical Innovation and Evaluation 1 Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations [J].
Barkun, Jeffrey S. ;
Aronson, Jeffrey K. ;
Feldman, Liane S. ;
Maddern, Guy J. ;
Strasberg, Steven M. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9695) :1089-1096
[5]   Delivering successful randomized controlled trials in surgery: Methods to optimize collaboration and study design [J].
Blencowe, Natalie S. ;
Cook, Jonathan A. ;
Pinkney, Thomas ;
Rogers, Chris ;
Reeves, Barnaby C. ;
Blazeby, Jane M. .
CLINICAL TRIALS, 2017, 14 (02) :211-218
[6]   Robotic versus thoracoscopic thymectomy: The current evidence [J].
Buentzel, Judith ;
Heinz, Judith ;
Hinterthaner, Marc ;
Schoendube, Friedrich A. ;
Straube, Carmen ;
Roever, Christian ;
Emmert, Alexander .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (04)
[7]   Thymectomy via open surgery or robotic video assisted thoracic surgery Can a recommendation already be made? [J].
Buentzel, Judith ;
Straube, Carmen ;
Heinz, Judith ;
Roever, Christian ;
Beham, Alexander ;
Emmert, Andreas ;
Hinterthaner, Marc ;
Danner, Bernhard C. ;
Emmert, Alexander .
MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (24)
[8]   Impact of Host Factors on Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cacciamani, Giovanni E. ;
Gill, Tania ;
Medina, Luis ;
Ashrafi, Akbar ;
Winter, Matthew ;
Sotelo, Rene ;
Artibani, Walter ;
Gill, Inderbir S. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04) :716-730
[9]   Laparoscopic versus open surgery: a systematic review evaluating Cochrane systematic reviews [J].
Carr, Brendan M. ;
Lyon, Jennifer A. ;
Romeiser, Jamie ;
Talamini, Mark ;
Shroyer, A. Laurie W. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (06) :1693-1709
[10]   Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: an update to the never-ending debate [J].
Chandrasekar, Thenappan ;
Tilki, Derya .
TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2018, 7 :S120-S123