Linearity of the fMRI Response in Category-Selective Regions of Human Visual Cortex

被引:8
作者
Horner, Aidan J.
Andrews, Timothy J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Psychol, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
visual cortex; FFA; PPA; HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE; BLOOD-FLOW; BOLD RESPONSE; DYNAMICS; CONTRAST; ADAPTATION; CORRELATE;
D O I
10.1002/hbm.20694
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine the linearity of the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response, as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), in category-selective regions of human visual cortex. We defined regions of the temporal lobe that were selective to faces (fusiform face area, FFA) and places (parahippocampal place area, PPA). We then determined the linearity of the BOLD response in these regions to their preferred and nonpreferred Stimuli. First, we tested the principle of scaling. As we increased the visibility of the stimulus, there was a corresponding linear increase in the fMRI signal in the FFA and PPA to their preferred stimulus (face and place, respectively). In contrast, responses in the FFA and PPA to the nonpreferred stimulus did not conform to the principle of scaling. Next, we asked whether the fMRI response in these regions Of Visual cortex conformed to the principle of additivity. To assess this, we determined whether the response to a long Stimulus block could be predicted by adding the response to multiple shorter duration blocks. Although the fMRI response in the FFA and PPA was generally linear to the preferred Stimulus, a more nonlinear response was apparent to the nonpreferred stimulus. In conclusion, the linearity of the BOLD response in the human ventral visual pathway varied across cortical region and stimulus category. This suggests that measures of linearity may provide a useful indication of neural selectivity in the brain. Hum Brain Mapp 30:2628-2640, 2009. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:2628 / 2640
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Visual cortex: How are faces and objects represented? [J].
Andrews, TJ .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (12) :R451-R453
[2]   Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition [J].
Avidan, G ;
Harel, M ;
Hendler, T ;
Ben-Bashat, D ;
Zohary, E ;
Malach, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 87 (06) :3102-3116
[3]   Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response [J].
Birn, RM ;
Saad, ZS ;
Bandettini, PA .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (04) :817-826
[4]   BOLD-fMRI response vs. transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse-train length: Testing for linearity [J].
Bohning, DE ;
Shastri, A ;
Lomarev, MP ;
Lorberbaum, JP ;
Nahas, Z ;
George, MS .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 17 (03) :279-290
[5]   Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1 [J].
Boynton, GM ;
Engel, SA ;
Glover, GH ;
Heeger, DJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 16 (13) :4207-4221
[6]  
Boynton GM, 2003, J NEUROSCI, V23, P8781
[7]  
Dale AM, 1997, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V5, P329, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1997)5:5<329::AID-HBM1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-5
[9]   A cortical representation of the local visual environment [J].
Epstein, R ;
Kanwisher, N .
NATURE, 1998, 392 (6676) :598-601
[10]  
Friston K., 1995, HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, V2, P189, DOI DOI 10.1002/HBM.460020402