Skeletal muscle ultrasonography: Visual versus quantitative evaluation

被引:180
作者
Pillen, Sigrid
van Keimpema, Mieke
Nievelstein, Rutger A. J.
Verrips, Aad
van Kruijsbergen-Raijmann, Wilma
Zwarts, Machiel J.
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Neuromuscular Ctr Nijmegen,Inst Neurol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Paediat, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Wilhelmina Childrens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Child Neurol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
ultrasonography; grey-scale analysis; visual evaluation; neuromuscular disorders; children; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.028
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In this study, we compared the sensitivity and specificity of visual versus quantitative evaluation of skeletal muscle ultrasound in children suspected of having a neuromuscular disorder (NMD). Ultrasonography (US) scans of four muscles (biceps brachii, forearm flexors, quadriceps femoris, anterior tibial muscle) were made in 76 children. All images were visually evaluated using the Heckmatt criteria and quantitatively evaluated with computer-assisted grey-scale analysis of muscle echo intensity. Visual evaluation could achieve a sensitivity up to 71%, with a specificity of 92%. With quantification, a sensitivity of 87% accompanied by a specificity of 67% was found, but other diagnostic values could be achieved, depending on the cut-off point. Quantification resulted in a higher interobserver agreement (kappa 0.86) compared with visual evaluation (kappa 0.53). We conclude that quantification of echo intensity is a more objective and accurate method. Because it can achieve higher sensitivities, it is better-suited for the screening task in the diagnostic phase of children with a NMD.
引用
收藏
页码:1315 / 1321
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Muscle ultrasonography and electromyography correlation for evaluation of floppy infants [J].
Aydinli, N ;
Baslo, B ;
Çaliskan, M ;
Ertas, M ;
Özmen, M .
BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 25 (01) :22-24
[2]  
Bargfrede M, 1999, Eur J Ultrasound, V10, P21, DOI 10.1016/S0929-8266(99)00040-3
[3]   Breast lesions on sonograms: Computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks [J].
Chen, CM ;
Chou, YH ;
Han, KC ;
Hung, GS ;
Tiu, CM ;
Chiou, HJ ;
Chiou, SY .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 226 (02) :504-514
[4]   Current status and future potential of computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging [J].
Doi, K .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 78 :S3-S19
[5]  
Feinstein A., 1985, Clinical epidemiology: the architecture of clinical research
[6]   MUSCLE IMAGING IN NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE USING COMPUTERIZED REAL-TIME SONOGRAPHY [J].
FISCHER, AQ ;
CARPENTER, DW ;
HARTLAGE, PL ;
CARROLL, JE ;
STEPHENS, S .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 1988, 11 (03) :270-275
[7]  
Fleiss J. L., 1981, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, V2nd
[8]   QUANTITATIVE SONOGRAPHY OF MUSCLE [J].
HECKMATT, J ;
RODILLO, E ;
DOHERTY, M ;
WILLSON, K ;
LEEMAN, S .
JOURNAL OF CHILD NEUROLOGY, 1989, 4 :S101-S106
[9]  
HECKMATT JZ, 1980, LANCET, V1, P1389
[10]   ULTRASOUND IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF MUSCLE DISEASE [J].
HECKMATT, JZ ;
LEEMAN, S ;
DUBOWITZ, V .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1982, 101 (05) :656-660