Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE study

被引:32
|
作者
Hemingway, H
Crook, AM
Dawson, JR
Edelman, J
Edmondson, S
Feder, G
Kopelman, P
Leatham, E
Magee, P
Parsons, L
Timmis, AD
Wood, A
机构
[1] Kensington & Chelsea & Westminster Hlth Author, Dept Res & Dev, London W2 6LX, England
[2] UCL, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sch Med, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Royal Hosp Trust, London E1 1BB, England
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Dept Gen Practice & Primary Care, St Bartholomews & Royal London Hosp Med Sch, Enfield EN1 4NS, Middx, England
[5] Greenwich & Bexley Hlth Author, Bexley Heath DA7 6HZ, England
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE | 1999年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
appropriateness; revascularization; quality of care; outcomes;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/21.4.421
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies investigating the appropriateness of invasive management of coronary disease had not reported the internal consistency of their ratings and may now be out of date. The aim of this study was to measure the influence of clinical factors on contemporary ratings of the appropriateness of coronary angiography, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the Appropriateness of Coronary Revascularisation (ACRE) study. Methods The Delphi-RAND technique was used, in which an expert panel (four cardiologists, three cardiothoracic surgeons, a general physician and a general practitioner), meeting In 1995, rated mutually exclusive indications (n = 2178 for angiography, n = 995 for PTCA and n = 984 for CABG). The main outcome measures were the appropriateness category (inappropriate, uncertain or appropriate) for each of the three procedures and treatment preference. Results For revascularization, the strongest determinant of inappropriateness was coronary anatomy. The odds ratio (OR) for inappropriate PTCA was 10.6 (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 4.8-23.5) for the effect of left main stem or three-vessel disease versus single-vessel disease, and for CABG it was 0.06 (95 per cent CI 0.03-0.15). The number of diseased vessels was strongly related to preference for medical, PTCA or CABG treatment (p for linear trend <0.001). Mild versus severe anginal symptoms were associated with inappropriate angiography (OR 2.0 (95 per cent CI 0.9-9.8), although this effect was stronger when only the cardiologists' ratings were considered (OR 10.1 (95 per cent CI 2.4-42.6)). Conclusion These are the first UK ratings of appropriateness covering all three procedures. The associations with clinical factors provide evidence of the internal consistency of these ratings. Prospective validation of these ratings against clinical outcomes is under way in the ACRE study.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 429
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative Invasive Coronary Angiography after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Berger, Tim
    Fagu, Albi
    Czerny, Martin
    Hartikainen, Tau
    Von Zur Muehlen, Constantin
    Kueri, Sami
    Eschenhagen, Matthias
    Kreibich, Maximilian
    Beyersdorf, Friedhelm
    Rylski, Bartosz
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2024,
  • [2] The prognostic impact of unplanned invasive coronary angiography following coronary artery bypass grafting
    Heuts, Samuel
    Bova, Roberto
    Romeo, Jamie L. R.
    Vriesendorp, Pieter A.
    van der Horst, Iwan C. C.
    Segers, Patrique
    Maessen, Jos G.
    Gollmann-Tepekoylu, Can
    van't Hof, Arnoud W. J.
    Bidar, Elham
    Lux, Arpad
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2024, 66 (02)
  • [3] Revascularization for coronary artery disease in diabetes mellitus: Angioplasty, stents and coronary artery bypass grafting
    Doron Aronson
    Elazer R. Edelman
    Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 2010, 11 : 75 - 86
  • [4] Is emergency and salvage coronary artery bypass grafting justified? The Nordic Emergency/Salvage coronary artery bypass grafting study
    Axelsson, Tomas A.
    Mennander, Ari
    Malmberg, Markus
    Gunn, Jarmo
    Jeppsson, Anders
    Gudbjartsson, Tomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 49 (05) : 1451 - 1456
  • [5] Revascularization for coronary artery disease in diabetes mellitus: Angioplasty, stents and coronary artery bypass grafting
    Aronson, Doron
    Edelman, Elazer R.
    REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2010, 11 (01) : 75 - 86
  • [6] The role of angioplasty in patients with acute coronary syndrome and previous coronary artery bypass grafting
    Potluri, Rahul
    Baig, Mudassar
    Mavi, Jaskaran Singh
    Ali, Noman
    Aziz, Amir
    Uppal, Hardeep
    Chandran, Suresh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 176 (03) : 760 - 763
  • [7] Contemporary coronary artery bypass grafting
    Taggart, David P.
    FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE, 2014, 8 (04) : 395 - 398
  • [8] Impact of timing of urgent coronary artery bypass grafting following coronary angiography on acute kidney injury
    Peine, Brandon S.
    Fu, Yuanyuan
    Oh, Saeram
    Bethea, J. Preston
    Quinn, Seth
    Mendes, O. Jesse
    Kindell, Linda
    Irish, William
    Akhter, Shahab A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 168 (02) : 533 - 542
  • [9] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    Morice, Marie-Claude
    Kappetein, A. Pieter
    Colombo, Antonio
    Holmes, David R.
    Mack, Michael J.
    Stahle, Elisabeth
    Feldman, Ted E.
    van den Brand, Marcel
    Bass, Eric J.
    Van Dyck, Nic
    Leadley, Katrin
    Dawkins, Keith D.
    Mohr, Friedrich W.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (10) : 961 - 972
  • [10] Coronary-coronary bypass grafting: artery or vein?
    Bazylev, Vladlen
    Rosseikin, Evgeny
    Tungusov, Dmitriy
    Mikulyak, Artur
    ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS, 2020, 28 (06) : 316 - 321