Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree

被引:63
作者
Cai, Fu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yushu [1 ,2 ]
Mi, Na [1 ,2 ]
Ming, Huiqing [3 ]
Zhang, Shujie [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hui [4 ]
Zhao, Xianli [1 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Atmospher Environm, Shenyang 110166, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Agrometeorol Disasters, Shenyang 110166, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Liaoning Prov Meteorol Serv Ctr, Shenyang 110166, Peoples R China
[4] Jinzhou Ecol & Agr Meteorol Ctr, Jinzhou 121001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Maize; Drought level; Transpiration; Photosynthesis; Organ water content; Dry matter; SAP FLOW; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; CONTROLLED ECOSYSTEMS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES; SEED PRODUCTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PLANT-GROWTH; GRAIN-YIELD; LEAF GROWTH; ACTIVE-ROLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106379
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A thorough understanding of the plant drought response mechanism and the relationships between plant functional traits and drought will help to improve the key biophysical process parameterization scheme in ecological and crop growth models. In this study, a drought level evaluation indicator, named water stress degree (D-ws), was established by synthetically considering soil water content (WC), evapotranspiration, and drought duration to obtain a quantitative description of drought level. The maize physiological and functional traits responses to drought and subsequent rewatering were also investigated. Drought-rewatering field experiments with no water addition for 40 days during the vegetative period (VP) and reproductive period (RP) were respectively conducted at Jinzhou Agrometerological Experimental Station, northeast China in 2014 and 2016. The D-ws values indicated that there were significant differences between growth stages and between years because the environmental conditions in 2014 and 2016 were different during the maize growth periods. Furthermore, D-ws was larger in 2016 than in 2014 during the VP and RP. Leaf photosynthesis had a certain adaptability to drought, and the transpiration rate (E) drought response (DR) was quicker than the photosynthetic rate (Pn) response, and P-n recovery was greater than E recovery when the plants were rewatered during the VP. However, leaf photosynthesis is more sensitive to drought and less available to recover as normal in subsequent rewatering during the RP than the VP, which was intensified as D-ws rose between 2014 and 2016. In addition, the leaf WC drought response was faster than the photosynthetic DR during the VP and RP, and leaf and stalk WCs responded more rapidly to drought during the VP than the RP. The decrease in ear WC during the earlier grouting period was larger in the VP than in the RP treatment. However, the drought-induced decrease in daily sap flow rate (DSF) during the RP was larger than during the VP, while the differences in DSF drought response and DSF recovery during rewatering were attributed to the inter-annual variation in Dws. Furthermore, the drought-caused reductions in leaf, stalk, and plant total dry matters and in leaf and stalk WCs had positively exponential or linear relationships with D-ws. The results can help to understand the disaster-causing mechanism of drought-stricken maize.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Adaptation to and recovery from drought stress at vegetative stages in wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars [J].
Abid, Muhammad ;
Tian, Zhongwei ;
Ata-Ul-Karim, Syed Tahir ;
Wang, Feng ;
Liu, Yang ;
Zahoor, Rizwan ;
Jiang, Dong ;
Dai, Tingbo .
FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2016, 43 (12) :1159-1169
[2]   Plant molecular stress responses face climate change [J].
Ahuja, Ishita ;
de Vos, Ric C. H. ;
Bones, Atle M. ;
Hall, Robert D. .
TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2010, 15 (12) :664-674
[3]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[4]   Evaluation of two evapotranspiration approaches simulated with the CSM-CERES-Maize model under different irrigation strategies and the impact on maize growth, development and soil moisture content for semi-arid conditions [J].
Anothai, J. ;
Soler, C. M. T. ;
Green, A. ;
Trout, T. J. ;
Hoogenboom, G. .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2013, 176 :64-76
[5]   Drought Induces Distinct Growth Response, Protection, and Recovery Mechanisms in the Maize Leaf Growth Zone [J].
Avramova, Viktoriya ;
AbdElgawad, Hamada ;
Zhang, Zhengfeng ;
Fotschki, Bartosz ;
Casadevall, Romina ;
Vergauwen, Lucia ;
Knapen, Dries ;
Taleisnik, Edith ;
Guisez, Yves ;
Asard, Han ;
Beemster, Gerrit T. S. .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 169 (02) :1382-+
[6]   Effect of soil drought stress on leaf water status, membrane permeability and enzymatic antioxidant system of maize [J].
Bai Li-Ping ;
Sui Fang-Gong ;
Ge Ti-Da ;
Sun Zhao-Hui ;
Lu Yin-Yan ;
Zhou Guang-Sheng .
PEDOSPHERE, 2006, 16 (03) :326-332
[7]   Identifying indicators for extreme wheat and maize yield losses [J].
Ben-Ari, Tamara ;
Adrian, Juliette ;
Klein, Tommy ;
Calanca, Pierluigi ;
Van der Velde, Marijn ;
Makowski, David .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 220 :130-140
[8]   Effects of competition on root-shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift? [J].
Berendse, Frank ;
Moller, Frans .
PLANT ECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (02) :567-573
[9]   Review: An integrated framework for crop adaptation to dry environments: Responses to transient and terminal drought [J].
Berger, Jens ;
Palta, Jairo ;
Vadez, Vincent .
PLANT SCIENCE, 2016, 253 :58-67
[10]  
[卜令铎 BU Lingduo], 2009, [西北农业学报, Acat Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica], V18, P88