Maize (Zea mays L.) physiological responses to drought and rewatering, and the associations with water stress degree

被引:58
|
作者
Cai, Fu [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yushu [1 ,2 ]
Mi, Na [1 ,2 ]
Ming, Huiqing [3 ]
Zhang, Shujie [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hui [4 ]
Zhao, Xianli [1 ]
机构
[1] China Meteorol Adm, Inst Atmospher Environm, Shenyang 110166, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Agrometeorol Disasters, Shenyang 110166, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Liaoning Prov Meteorol Serv Ctr, Shenyang 110166, Peoples R China
[4] Jinzhou Ecol & Agr Meteorol Ctr, Jinzhou 121001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Maize; Drought level; Transpiration; Photosynthesis; Organ water content; Dry matter; SAP FLOW; CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE; CONTROLLED ECOSYSTEMS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESSES; SEED PRODUCTION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PLANT-GROWTH; GRAIN-YIELD; LEAF GROWTH; ACTIVE-ROLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106379
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
A thorough understanding of the plant drought response mechanism and the relationships between plant functional traits and drought will help to improve the key biophysical process parameterization scheme in ecological and crop growth models. In this study, a drought level evaluation indicator, named water stress degree (D-ws), was established by synthetically considering soil water content (WC), evapotranspiration, and drought duration to obtain a quantitative description of drought level. The maize physiological and functional traits responses to drought and subsequent rewatering were also investigated. Drought-rewatering field experiments with no water addition for 40 days during the vegetative period (VP) and reproductive period (RP) were respectively conducted at Jinzhou Agrometerological Experimental Station, northeast China in 2014 and 2016. The D-ws values indicated that there were significant differences between growth stages and between years because the environmental conditions in 2014 and 2016 were different during the maize growth periods. Furthermore, D-ws was larger in 2016 than in 2014 during the VP and RP. Leaf photosynthesis had a certain adaptability to drought, and the transpiration rate (E) drought response (DR) was quicker than the photosynthetic rate (Pn) response, and P-n recovery was greater than E recovery when the plants were rewatered during the VP. However, leaf photosynthesis is more sensitive to drought and less available to recover as normal in subsequent rewatering during the RP than the VP, which was intensified as D-ws rose between 2014 and 2016. In addition, the leaf WC drought response was faster than the photosynthetic DR during the VP and RP, and leaf and stalk WCs responded more rapidly to drought during the VP than the RP. The decrease in ear WC during the earlier grouting period was larger in the VP than in the RP treatment. However, the drought-induced decrease in daily sap flow rate (DSF) during the RP was larger than during the VP, while the differences in DSF drought response and DSF recovery during rewatering were attributed to the inter-annual variation in Dws. Furthermore, the drought-caused reductions in leaf, stalk, and plant total dry matters and in leaf and stalk WCs had positively exponential or linear relationships with D-ws. The results can help to understand the disaster-causing mechanism of drought-stricken maize.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to drought stress and rewatering in maize (Zea mays L.)
    Liru Cao
    Xiaomin Lu
    Guorui Wang
    Pengyu Zhang
    Jiaxu Fu
    Zhenhua Wang
    Li Wei
    Tongchao Wang
    Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 2021, 296 : 1203 - 1219
  • [2] Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to drought stress and rewatering in maize (Zea mays L.)
    Cao, Liru
    Lu, Xiaomin
    Wang, Guorui
    Zhang, Pengyu
    Fu, Jiaxu
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Wei, Li
    Wang, Tongchao
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS, 2021, 296 (06) : 1203 - 1219
  • [3] Physiological and molecular responses of maize (Zea mays L.) plants to drought and rehydration
    Voronin, P. Yu
    Maevskaya, S. N.
    Nikolaeva, M. K.
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2019, 57 (03) : 850 - 856
  • [4] Physiological Responses of Contrasting Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids to Repeated Drought
    Kraenzlein, Markus
    Geilfus, Christoph-Martin
    Franzisky, Bastian L.
    Zhang, Xudong
    Wimmer, Monika A.
    Zoerb, Christian
    JOURNAL OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATION, 2022, 41 (07) : 2708 - 2718
  • [5] Physiological Responses of Contrasting Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids to Repeated Drought
    Markus Kränzlein
    Christoph-Martin Geilfus
    Bastian L. Franzisky
    Xudong Zhang
    Monika A. Wimmer
    Christian Zörb
    Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2022, 41 : 2708 - 2718
  • [6] Effects of drought stress and rewatering on antioxidant systems and relative water content in different growth stages of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids
    Ghahfarokhi, Maryam Goodarzian
    Mansurifar, Syrus
    Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi, Ruhollah
    Saeidi, Mohsen
    Jamshidi, Amir Mohammad
    Ghasemi, Elahe
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (04) : 493 - 506
  • [7] High Temperature Stress Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L.): Physiological and Molecular Mechanisms
    Tiwari, Yogesh Kumar
    Yadav, Sushil Kumar
    JOURNAL OF PLANT BIOLOGY, 2019, 62 (02) : 93 - 102
  • [8] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Maize (Zea mays L.) Cultivars Under Salinity Stress
    Iftikhar, Nosheen
    Perveen, Shagufta
    Ali, Baber
    Saleem, Muhammad Hamzah
    Al-Sadoon, Mohammad Khalid
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2024, 48 (03) : 332 - 343
  • [9] Morphological and Physiological Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Drought Stress during Reproductive Stage
    Yasin, Saba
    Zavala-Garcia, Francisco
    Nino-Medina, Guillermo
    Rodriguez-Salinas, Pablo Alan
    Gutierrez-Diez, Adriana
    Sinagawa-Garcia, Sugey Ramona
    Lugo-Cruz, Eleazar
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [10] Physiological response of maize (Zea mays L.) to high temperature stress
    Coskun, Yalcin
    Coskun, Ayse
    Demirel, Ufuk
    Ozden, Mustafa
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 2011, 5 (08) : 966 - 972