Co-production of knowledge-action systems in urban sustainable governance: The KASA approach

被引:79
作者
Munoz-Erickson, Tischa A. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA, Int Inst Trop Forestry, Forest Serv, Rio Piedras, PR 00926 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Co-production; Knowledge-action systems; Science-policy interface; Sustainability; Urban governance; Social networks; Boundary work; Epistemic cultures; Future visions; Tropical city; POLICY; POWER; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2013.09.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines how knowledge-action systems - the networks of actors involved in the production, sharing and use of policy-relevant knowledge - work in the process of developing sustainable strategies for cities. I developed an interdisciplinary framework - the knowledge-action system analysis (KASA) framework - that integrates concepts of the co-production of knowledge and social order with social network analysis tools to analyze existing configurations of knowledge-action systems in the city of San Juan, Puerto Rico, and how these are shaping both what we know and how we envision the future of cities. I applied KASA in the context of land use and green area governance and found that a diverse network of actors are contributing diverse knowledge types, thus showing potential for innovation in governance. This potential is conditioned, however, by various political and cultural factors, such as: (1) actors dominating knowledge about land use are the same ones that control urban land resources, (2) conventional planning expertise and procedures dominate over other alternative ways of knowing; (3) multiple visions and boundary arrangements co-exist in the city, and (4) boundary spanning opportunities limited by assumptions that knowledge and action should be done in distinct spheres of city planning. This study shows that developing adaptive and innovative capacities for sustainability is not solely a matter of harnessing more science, but about managing the politics of knowledge and visions that emerge from complex governance systems. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 191
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature [J].
McNie, Elizabeth C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2007, 10 (01) :17-38
[22]   Matching knowledge brokering strategies to environmental policy problems and settings [J].
Michaels, Sarah .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2009, 12 (07) :994-1011
[23]   New civic epistemologies of quantification: Making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability [J].
Miller, C .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2005, 30 (03) :403-432
[24]  
Miller C., 2010, Knowledge systems analysis. A report for the Advancing Conservation in a Social Context Project
[25]  
Munoz-Erickson T. A., 2012, THESIS ARIZONA STATE
[26]  
Muñoz-Erickson TA, 2010, ECOL SOC, V15
[27]   From science to policy through transdisciplinary research [J].
Pohl, Christian .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (01) :46-53
[28]  
Roux DJ, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11
[29]   Beyond the research-policy interface. Boundary arrangements at research-stakeholder interfaces in the policy debate on biofuel sustainability in Mozambique [J].
Schut, Marc ;
van Paassen, Annemarie ;
Leeuwis, Cees .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 27 :91-102
[30]  
Shapin Steven., 1995, Perspectives on Science, V3, P255