The effect of anterior versus posterior glide joint mobilization on external rotation range of motion in patients with shoulder adhesive capsulitis

被引:95
作者
Johnson, Andrea J.
Godges, Joseph J.
Zimmerman, Grenith J.
Ounanian, Leroy L.
机构
[1] Beaver Med Grp, Dept Phys Rehabil, Redlands, CA 92373 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Phys Therapy Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Fellowship Program, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Phys Therapy Holdings Inc, Clin Educ & Practice, Pacific Palisades, CA USA
[5] Loma Linda Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Loma Linda, CA 92350 USA
关键词
frozen shoulder; manual therapy; physical therapy;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2007.2307
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
STUDY DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of anterior versus posterior glide mobilization techniques for improving shoulder external rotation range of motion (ROM) in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BACKGROUND: Physical therapists use joint mobilization techniques to treat motion impairments in patients with adhesive capsulitis. However, opinions of the value of anterior versus posterior mobilization procedures to improve external rotation ROM differ METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty consecutive subjects with a primary diagnosis of shoulder adhesive capsulitis and exhibiting a specific externa rotation ROM deficit were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. All subjects received 6 therapy sessions consisting of application of therapeutic ultrasound, joint mobilization, and upper-body ergometer exercise. Treatment differed between groups in the direction of the mobilization technique performed. Shoulder external rotation ROM measured initially and after each treatment session was compared within and between groups and analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA, followed by paired and independent t tests. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in shoulder external rotation ROM between groups prior to initiating the treatment program. A significant difference between groups (P = .001) was present by the third treatment. The individuals in the anterior mobilization group had a mean improvement in external rotation ROM of 3.0 degrees (SD, 10.8 degrees; P = .40), whereas the individuals in the posterior mobilization group had a mean improvement of 31.3 degrees (SD, 74 degrees; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A posteriorly directed joint mobilization technique was more effective than an anteriorly directed mobilization technique for improving external rotation ROM in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Both groups had a significant decrease in pain.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 99
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   Effects of ultrasound and stretch on knee ligament extensibility [J].
Reed, BV ;
Ashikaga, T ;
Fleming, BC ;
Zimny, NJ .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2000, 30 (06) :341-347
[52]   GONIOMETRIC RELIABILITY IN A CLINICAL SETTING - SHOULDER MEASUREMENTS [J].
RIDDLE, DL ;
ROTHSTEIN, JM ;
LAMB, RL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (05) :668-673
[53]   Glenohumeral gliding manipulation following interscalene brachial plexus block in patients with adhesive capsulitis [J].
Roubal, PJ ;
Dobritt, D ;
Placzek, JD .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 24 (02) :66-77
[54]   Shoulder kinematics in subjects with frozen shoulder [J].
Rundquist, PJ ;
Anderson, DD ;
Guanche, CA ;
Ludewig, PM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2003, 84 (10) :1473-1479
[55]  
Segmuller H E, 1995, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V4, P403, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80030-8
[56]   FROZEN SHOULDER - A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
SHAFFER, B ;
TIBONE, JE ;
KERLAN, RK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (05) :738-746
[57]   THE ROTATOR CUFF OPPOSES SUPERIOR TRANSLATION OF THE HUMERAL HEAD [J].
SHARKEY, NA ;
MARDER, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (03) :270-275
[58]  
Siegel LB, 1999, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V59, P1843
[59]  
SOSLOWSKY LJ, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P181
[60]   THE EFFECTS OF MANUAL THERAPY ON CONNECTIVE-TISSUE [J].
THRELKELD, AJ .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1992, 72 (12) :893-902