A Comparison of the Efficiency of Parameter Estimation Methods in the Context of Streamflow Forecasting

被引:0
|
作者
Parviz, L. [1 ]
Kholghi, M. [1 ]
Hoorfar, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Soil & Water Engn, Dept Irrigat & Reclamat Engn, Karaj, Iran
来源
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2010年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
ARIMA model; Conditional likelihood; Forecasting; Genetic algorithm; Parameter estimation; MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD; TIME-SERIES; ARIMA MODELS; ALGORITHM; DOMAIN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The forecasting of hydrological variables, such as streamflow, plays an important role in water resource planning and management. Recently, the development of stochastic models is regarded as a major step for this purpose. Streamflow forecasting using the ARIMA model can be conducted when unknown parameters are estimated correctly because parameter estimation is one of the crucial steps in modeling process. The main objective of this research is to explore the performance of parameter estimation methods in the ARIMA model. In this study, four parameter estimation methods have been used: (i) autocorrelation function based on model parameters; (ii) conditional likelihood; (iii) unconditional likelihood; and (iv) genetic algorithm. Streamflow data of Ouromieh River basin situated in Northwest Iran has been selected as a case study for this research. The results of these four parameter estimation methods have been compared using RMSE, RME, SE, MAE and minimizing the sum squares of error. This research indicates that the genetic algorithm and unconditional likelihood methods are, respectively, more appropriate in comparison with other methods but, due to the complexity of the model, genetic algorithm has high convergence to a global optimum.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 60
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forecasting of Streamflow and Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Methods: A Case Study for Meram Stream in Konya, Turkey
    Asaad, Mustafa Najat
    Eryuruk, Sule
    Eryuruk, Kagan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [2] Comparison of Two Entropy Spectral Analysis Methods for Streamflow Forecasting in Northwest China
    Zhou, Zhenghong
    Ju, Juanli
    Su, Xiaoling
    Singh, Vijay P.
    Zhang, Gengxi
    ENTROPY, 2017, 19 (11)
  • [3] Comparison of traffic forecasting methods in urban and suburban context
    Salotti, Julien
    Fenet, Serge
    Billot, Romain
    El Faouzi, Nour-Eddin
    Solnon, Christine
    2018 IEEE 30TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ICTAI), 2018, : 846 - 853
  • [4] Comparison of parameter estimation methods for reliability model
    Wang X.-F.
    Shen G.-X.
    Zhang Y.-Z.
    Chen B.-K.
    Zheng S.
    Liu W.
    Huanan Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science), 2011, 39 (06): : 47 - 52
  • [5] Comparison of parameter estimation methods for crop models
    Tremblay, M
    Wallach, D
    AGRONOMIE, 2004, 24 (6-7): : 351 - 365
  • [6] Comparison of Classical and Machine Learning Methods in Estimation of Missing Streamflow Data
    Dariane, A. B.
    Borhan, M. I.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2024, 38 (04) : 1453 - 1478
  • [7] Research on Methods of Parameter Estimation in Combining Forecasting Based on Harmonic Mean
    Wang Yingming Dept. of Automation
    JournalofSystemsEngineeringandElectronics, 1998, (01) : 3 - 5
  • [8] Comparison of parameter estimation methods of the two-parameter Weibull distribution
    Haghighat Jou, Parviz
    Mohammadrezapour, Omolbani
    Mirhashemi, Seyed Hassan
    SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 8 (04)
  • [9] Comparison of parameter estimation methods of the two-parameter Weibull distribution
    Parviz Haghighat Jou
    Omolbani Mohammadrezapour
    Seyed Hassan Mirhashemi
    Sustainable Water Resources Management, 2022, 8
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Artificial Intelligence Methods for Streamflow Forecasting
    Wei, Yaxing
    Bin Hashim, Huzaifa
    Lai, Sai Hin
    Chong, Kai Lun
    Huang, Yuk Feng
    Ahmed, Ali Najah
    Sherif, Mohsen
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 10865 - 10885