Evapotranspiration Response to Climate Change in Semi-Arid Areas: Using Random Forest as Multi-Model Ensemble Method

被引:16
作者
Ruiz- Alvarez, Marcos [1 ]
Gomariz-Castillo, Francisco [1 ,2 ]
Alonso-Sarria, Francisco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Univ Inst Water & Environm, Murcia 30100, Spain
[2] Euromediterranean Water Inst IEA, Murcia 30100, Spain
关键词
random forest regression; reference evapotranspiration; multi-model ensembles; Climate Change; fifth assessment report; random forest regression kriging; Kling-Gupta efficiency; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; CHANGE PROJECTIONS; COUPLED MODEL; LOESS PLATEAU; PREDICTION; RAINFALL; PRECIPITATION; RELIABILITY; AVERAGE; ERROR;
D O I
10.3390/w13020222
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Large ensembles of climate models are increasingly available either as ensembles of opportunity or perturbed physics ensembles, providing a wealth of additional data that is potentially useful for improving adaptation strategies to climate change. In this work, we propose a framework to evaluate the predictive capacity of 11 multi-model ensemble methods (MMEs), including random forest (RF), to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ET0) using 10 AR5 models for the scenarios RCP4.5 and RCP8.5. The study was carried out in the Segura Hydrographic Demarcation (SE of Spain), a typical Mediterranean semiarid area. ET0 was estimated in the historical scenario (1970-2000) using a spatially calibrated Hargreaves model. MMEs obtained better results than any individual model for reproducing daily ET0. In validation, RF resulted more accurate than other MMEs (Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) M=0.903, SD=0.034 for KGE and M=3.17, SD=2.97 for absolute percent bias). A statistically significant positive trend was observed along the 21st century for RCP8.5, but this trend stabilizes in the middle of the century for RCP4.5. The observed spatial pattern shows a larger ET0 increase in headwaters and a smaller increase in the coast.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 107 条
[71]   Predicting regional climate change: living with uncertainty [J].
Mitchell, TD ;
Hulme, M .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 23 (01) :57-78
[72]  
Morales A., 2005, Observatorio Medioambiental, V8, P73
[73]   An empirical comparison of alternative schemes for combining electricity spot price forecasts [J].
Nowotarski, Jakub ;
Raviv, Eran ;
Trueck, Stefan ;
Weron, Rafal .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 :395-412
[74]   Identifying a robust method to build RCMs ensemble as climate forcing for hydrological impact models [J].
Olmos Gimenez, P. ;
Garcia Galiano, S. G. ;
Giraldo-Osorio, J. D. .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2016, 174 :31-40
[75]   Assessing Regional Climate Models (RCMs) Ensemble-Driven Reference Evapotranspiration over Spain [J].
Olmos Gimenez, Patricia ;
Garcia-Galiano, Sandra G. .
WATER, 2018, 10 (09)
[76]   TO COMBINE OR NOT TO COMBINE - ISSUES OF COMBINING FORECASTS [J].
PALM, FC ;
ZELLNER, A .
JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 11 (08) :687-701
[77]   Climate change effects on the hydrology of the headwaters of the Tagus River: implications for the management of the Tagus-Segura transfer [J].
Pellicer-Martinez, Francisco ;
Miguel Martinez-Paz, Jose .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (12) :6473-6491
[78]   Spatiotemporal change and trend analysis of potential evapotranspiration over the Loess Plateau of China during 2011-2100 [J].
Peng, Shouzhang ;
Ding, Yongxia ;
Wen, Zhongming ;
Chen, Yunming ;
Cao, Yang ;
Ren, Jingyu .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2017, 233 :183-194
[79]  
R Core Team, 2020, R: a language and environment for statistical computing
[80]   Using Bayesian model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles [J].
Raftery, AE ;
Gneiting, T ;
Balabdaoui, F ;
Polakowski, M .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2005, 133 (05) :1155-1174