Literature review on policies to mitigate GHG emissions for cement and concrete

被引:91
作者
Busch, Pablo [1 ]
Kendall, Alissa [2 ]
Murphy, Colin W. [3 ]
Miller, Sabbie A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Energy & Efficiency Inst, 1605 Tilia St 100, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Policy Inst Energy Environm & Econ, 1 Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Cement; Concrete; Climate policy; Decarbonization; GHG emissions; Carbon intensity; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY; STRATEGIES; INDUSTRY; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106278
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The production and use of cement, the binding agent in concrete, emits seven percent of global greenhouse gas emissions annually. Achieving climate change mitigation targets, such as those proposed in the Paris Agreement, requires emission reductions from this sector. The body of research on technical solutions to cement and concrete decarbonization is wide, but technical measures must be coupled with effective policy to achieve decarbonization. This study undertakes a review of previous research on cement and concrete decarbonization and analyzes the most common proposed measures along their level of action, involved stakeholders, barriers to implementation, and coordinated policy actions. The review yielded 37 studies from peer-reviewed articles and technical reports. Analysis showed consensus on the primary technical measures to decarbonize. For cement production, measures include (I) improved energy efficiency, (II) fuel switching, (III) carbon capture utilization and storage, and (IV) reduction of the clinker-tocement ratio. For concrete production and its end-uses common proposed measures include (V) alternative binders, (VI) material and construction efficiency and (VII) CO2 uptake by concrete. While the literature shows an emerging consensus around technical solutions for decarbonization, there was less clarity about preferred policy solutions and key barriers. The reviewed studies consistently focused on technical solutions and roadmaps to achieve decarbonization, but often omitted discussion of barriers to implementation or specific policy actions to overcome them. Further research is needed to consider the feasibility and costs of implementation; identify potential points of entry for policy actions at different jurisdictional scales; and identify enforcement needs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]  
Karlsson I., 2020, Technical roadmap cement industry
[32]   Roadmap for Decarbonization of the Building and Construction Industry-A Supply Chain Analysis Including Primary Production of Steel and Cement [J].
Karlsson, Ida ;
Rootzen, Johan ;
Toktarova, Alla ;
Odenberger, Mikael ;
Johnsson, Filip ;
Goransson, Lisa .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (16)
[33]  
Lehne J., 2018, Making concrete change
[34]  
nnovation in low-carbon cement and concrete
[35]   Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Ash-Incorporated Concrete: One Step towards Environmental Justice [J].
Li, Jiaqi .
BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (11)
[36]   Brick by brick: Governing industry decarbonization in the face of uncertainty and risk [J].
Lofgren, Asa ;
Rootzen, Johan .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 40 :189-202
[37]   Achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions in the cement industry via value chain mitigation strategies [J].
Miller, Sabbie A. ;
Habert, Guillaume ;
Myers, Rupert J. ;
Harvey, John T. .
ONE EARTH, 2021, 4 (10) :1398-1411
[38]   Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20% [J].
Miller, Sabbie A. ;
Horvath, Arpad ;
Monteiro, Paulo J. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (07)
[39]  
MPA, 2013, MPA CEM GHG RED STRA
[40]   A review of the technologies, economics and policy instruments for decarbonising energy-intensive manufacturing industries [J].
Napp, T. A. ;
Gambhir, A. ;
Hills, T. P. ;
Florin, N. ;
Fennell, P. S. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 30 :616-640