Technology Fusion Characteristics in the Solar Photovoltaic Industry of South Korea: A Patent Network Analysis Using IPC Co-Occurrence

被引:18
作者
Son, Sungho [1 ,2 ]
Cho, Nam-Wook [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Electrotechnol Res Inst KERI, Elect Policy Res Ctr, 138 Naesonsoonhwan Ro, Uiwang Si 16029, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ SNU, Technol Management Econ & Policy Program TEMEP, Seoul 01811, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ Sci & Technol SEOUL TECH, Ind & Informat Syst Engn, 232 Gongneung Ro, Seoul 01811, South Korea
关键词
solar photovoltaic industry; technology fusion; international patent classification (IPC) code co-occurrence; social network analysis; exploration and exploitation; CARBON ELECTRICITY SYSTEM; OF-THE-ART; TRANSITION PATHWAYS; WIND POWER; PV POWER; ENERGY; INNOVATION; TRAJECTORIES; CONVERGENCE; POLICY;
D O I
10.3390/su12219084
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the technology fusion phenomena and its characteristics, focusing on the solar photovoltaic (PV) industry in South Korea. Co-occurrence networks of international patent classification (IPC) codes have been analyzed based on the photovoltaic patents in South Korea during a 15-year period (2002-2016). The results reveal that, while the strength of technology fusion has greatly increased during the period, the structural pattern of fusion has been diversified or decentralized. In the early stage, widespread emergence of new technologies has been observed but, in the later stage, the focus of fusion shifted to the utilization of existing technologies. The characteristics of key technologies also changed as the technology fusion progressed. In the early stage, product technologies such as materials and components played a central role, while operation technologies such as monitor, structure, and arrangement were the drivers of fusion during the later stage.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis [J].
Abbas, Assad ;
Zhang, Limin ;
Khan, Samee U. .
WORLD PATENT INFORMATION, 2014, 37 :3-13
[2]   Analyzing and organizing nanotechnology development: Application of the institutional analysis development framework to nanotechnology consortia [J].
Allarakhia, Minna ;
Walsh, Steven .
TECHNOVATION, 2012, 32 (3-4) :216-226
[3]  
Almeida P., 2003, The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, V1st, P356
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Introduction to social network methods
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SUSTAINABILITY BASEL, DOI [DOI 10.3390/su10114166, DOI 10.3390/SU10114166]
[6]   Transition pathways for a UK low-carbon electricity system: Comparing scenarios and technology implications [J].
Barton, John ;
Davies, Lloyd ;
Dooley, Ben ;
Foxon, Timothy J. ;
Galloway, Stuart ;
Hammond, Geoffrey P. ;
O'Grady, Aine ;
Robertson, Elizabeth ;
Thomson, Murray .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :2779-2790
[7]   Knowledge positions in high-tech markets: Trajectories, standards, strategies and true innovators [J].
Bekkers, Rudi ;
Martinelli, Arianna .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (07) :1192-1216
[8]   The adoption of open innovation within the telecommunication industry [J].
Bigliardi, Barbara ;
Dormio, Alberto Ivo ;
Galati, Francesco .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 15 (01) :27-+
[9]   Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification [J].
Breschi, S ;
Lissoni, F ;
Malerba, F .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (01) :69-87
[10]   Global overview on grid-parity [J].
Breyer, Christian ;
Gerlach, Alexander .
PROGRESS IN PHOTOVOLTAICS, 2013, 21 (01) :121-136