Port vulnerability assessment from the perspective of critical infrastructure interdependency

被引:46
作者
Hsieh, Cheng-Hsien [1 ]
Tai, Hui-Huang [2 ]
Lee, Yang-Ning [3 ]
机构
[1] Chihlee Inst Technol, Dept Mkt & Logist Management, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[2] Natl Kaohsiung Marine Univ, Dept Shipping & Transportat Management, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Commerce Dev Res Inst, Res Dept Business Dev & Policy, New Taipei City, Taiwan
关键词
RESOURCE-ALLOCATION POLICIES; COGNITIVE MAPS; SYSTEMS; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; PROJECT; GIS;
D O I
10.1080/03088839.2013.856523
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The increasing damages and losses bring requests to improve coping capacities for extreme conditions on the identification of and improvement to socioeconomic vulnerabilities. Disruptions to critical infrastructure (CI) influence the capacities for resilience and sustainable daily operations both directly and by causing failures in one system that in turn affects other systems. Among the transportation systems widely identified as national CI that should be protected, ports provide substantial employment, industrial activity, along with national and regional development. This study thus examines the vulnerability of port failures from an interdependency perspective. Fourteen vulnerable factors are developed by literatures as well as in-depth interviews. Four international commercial ports in Taiwan are employed as empirical cases to evaluate port vulnerability through semi-quantitatively systematic methods, including fuzzy cognitive maps and sensitivity model, while geographic information systems are used to clarify the spatial-functional interdependency. In addition to the underestimated vulnerability because of omitted interdependency, analytical results reveal that capacity and efficiency significantly affect port vulnerability. Increasing local cargo bases and co-opetition are suggested to improve the port vulnerability. The proposed assessment framework helps decision-makers understand the interdependent vulnerabilities and adopt appropriate strategies for the mitigation of losses.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 606
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Serviceability of earthquake-damaged water systems: Effects of electrical power availability and power backup systems on system vulnerability [J].
Adachi, Takao ;
Ellingwood, Bruce R. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (01) :78-88
[2]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[3]  
Aguilar J., 2005, INT J COMPUTATIONAL, V3, P27
[4]   The Three Gorges Dam Project from a systems viewpoint [J].
Alberts, HC ;
Alberts, RM ;
Bloom, MF ;
LaFlamme, AD ;
Teerikangas, S .
SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2004, 21 (06) :585-602
[5]  
[Anonymous], GLOB RISKS 2010 GLOB
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, REV MAR TRANSP
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2004, LIV RISK GLOB REV DI
[8]   A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism [J].
Apostolakis, GE ;
Lemon, DM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (02) :361-376
[9]   Prioritization of bridges and tunnels in earthquake risk mitigation using multicriteria decision analysis: Application to Lisbon [J].
Bana E Costa, Carlos A. ;
Oliveira, Carlos S. ;
Vieira, Victor .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 36 (03) :442-450
[10]   Formal Vulnerability Assessment of a maritime transportation system [J].
Berle, Oyvind ;
Asbjornslett, Bjorn Egil ;
Rice, James B. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (06) :696-705