Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility and Corporate Hypocrisy: Warmth, Motive and the Protective Value of Corporate Social Responsibility

被引:49
作者
Chen, Zhifeng [1 ]
Hang, Haiming [2 ]
Pavelin, Stephen [3 ]
Porter, Lynda [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Accounting & Finance, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bath, Mkt, Bath, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bath, Business & Soc, Bath, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bath, Business Econ, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
corporate hypocrisy; corporate social responsibility; corporate social irresponsibility; experimental studies; STEREOTYPE CONTENT; CSR; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; REPUTATION; ATTRIBUTIONS; PERCEPTION; FRAMEWORK; ATTITUDES; LICENSE;
D O I
10.1017/beq.2019.50
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines how a firm's prior record on corporate social responsibility (CSR) influences individual stakeholders' perceptions of corporate hypocrisy in the wake of a corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) event. Our research extends extant corporate hypocrisy literature by highlighting the role of individual stakeholders' inferences about a genuine CSR motive in their judgments of corporate hypocrisy. This can serve to differentiate perceived corporate hypocrisy from inconsistency that arises because of a lack of ability and/or resources. Our research further identifies a source for such perceptions: individual stakeholders' perceptions of firm warmth generated by a firm's prior record of CSR. In addition, we find that when CSR and CSI are in the same (vs. different) domains, it can strengthen perceptions of hypocrisy. This provides direct evidence to explain why markets react differently when CSR and CSI events occur in the same domain (vs. different ones).
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 524
页数:39
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]   UNDERSTANDING ATTRIBUTIONS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL IRRESPONSIBILITY [J].
Lange, Donald ;
Washburn, Nathan T. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2012, 37 (02) :300-326
[42]   The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling [J].
Lei, M ;
Lomax, RG .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2005, 12 (01) :1-27
[43]   Can doing good lead to doing poorly? Firm value implications of CSR in the face of CSI [J].
Lenz, Isabell ;
Wetzel, Hauke A. ;
Hammerschmidt, Maik .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 2017, 45 (05) :677-697
[44]   The Debate over Doing Good: Corporate Social Performance, Strategic Marketing Levers, and Firm-Idiosyncratic Risk [J].
Luo, Xueming ;
Bhattacharya, C. B. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2009, 73 (06) :198-213
[45]  
Margolis J.D., 2007, Does it Pay to Be Good? A Meta-Analysis and Redirection of Research on the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance
[46]   Ambivalence and reputation stability: An experimental investigation on the effects of new information [J].
Mariconda S. ;
Lurati F. .
Corporate Reputation Review, 2015, 18 (2) :87-98
[47]  
Marks & Spencer plc, 2016, SUST BENCHM IND
[48]   Implicit and "explicit" CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility [J].
Matten, Dirk ;
Moon, Jeremy .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 33 (02) :404-424
[49]  
Mattingly J.E., 2006, Business Society, V45, P20
[50]   PSYCHOLOGICAL LICENSE: WHEN IT IS NEEDED AND HOW IT FUNCTIONS [J].
Miller, Dale T. ;
Effron, Daniel A. .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 43, 2010, 43 :115-155