Corporate Social (Ir)responsibility and Corporate Hypocrisy: Warmth, Motive and the Protective Value of Corporate Social Responsibility

被引:49
作者
Chen, Zhifeng [1 ]
Hang, Haiming [2 ]
Pavelin, Stephen [3 ]
Porter, Lynda [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England, Accounting & Finance, Bristol, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bath, Mkt, Bath, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bath, Business & Soc, Bath, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bath, Business Econ, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
corporate hypocrisy; corporate social responsibility; corporate social irresponsibility; experimental studies; STEREOTYPE CONTENT; CSR; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; REPUTATION; ATTRIBUTIONS; PERCEPTION; FRAMEWORK; ATTITUDES; LICENSE;
D O I
10.1017/beq.2019.50
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article examines how a firm's prior record on corporate social responsibility (CSR) influences individual stakeholders' perceptions of corporate hypocrisy in the wake of a corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) event. Our research extends extant corporate hypocrisy literature by highlighting the role of individual stakeholders' inferences about a genuine CSR motive in their judgments of corporate hypocrisy. This can serve to differentiate perceived corporate hypocrisy from inconsistency that arises because of a lack of ability and/or resources. Our research further identifies a source for such perceptions: individual stakeholders' perceptions of firm warmth generated by a firm's prior record of CSR. In addition, we find that when CSR and CSI are in the same (vs. different) domains, it can strengthen perceptions of hypocrisy. This provides direct evidence to explain why markets react differently when CSR and CSI events occur in the same domain (vs. different ones).
引用
收藏
页码:486 / 524
页数:39
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Nonprofits Are Seen as Warm and For-Profits as Competent: Firm Stereotypes Matter [J].
Aaker, Jennifer ;
Vohs, Kathleen D. ;
Mogilner, Cassie .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2010, 37 (02) :224-237
[2]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[3]   Investigating the direct and indirect effects of corporate hypocrisy and perceived corporate reputation on consumers' attitudes toward the company [J].
Arli, Denni ;
Grace, Anthony ;
Palmer, Janet ;
Pham, Cuong .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2017, 37 :139-145
[4]   The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility A Critique and an Indirect Path Forward [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2019, 58 (01) :167-190
[5]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[6]   A Meta-Analytic Review of Moral Licensing [J].
Blanken, Irene ;
van de Ven, Niels ;
Zeelenberg, Marcel .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2015, 41 (04) :540-558
[7]   How Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Consumer Response to Service Failure in Buyer-Seller Relationships? [J].
Bolton, Lisa E. ;
Mattila, Anna S. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2015, 91 (01) :140-153
[8]   Corporate reputation and social performance: The importance of fit [J].
Brammer, SJ ;
Pavelin, S .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2006, 43 (03) :435-455
[9]   How do Consumers Reconcile Positive and Negative CSR-Related Information to Form an Ethical Brand Perception? A Mixed Method Inquiry [J].
Brunk, Katja H. ;
de Boer, Cara .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 161 (02) :443-458
[10]  
Brunsson N., 2002, The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organization, V2nd