VIRTUAL ORGANIZATIONS AS TEMPORARY ORGANIZATIONAL NETWORKS: BOUNDARY BLURRING, DILEMMAS, CAREER CHARACTERISTICS AND LEADERSHIP

被引:0
作者
Lambrechts, Frank [1 ]
Sips, Koen [2 ]
Taillieu, Tharsi [3 ]
Grieten, Styn [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hasselt, Ctr Entrepreneurship & Innovat KIZOK, Diepenbeek, Belgium
[2] Point Consulting Grp, Lint, Belgium
[3] Univ Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
[4] HUBrussel, Ctr Corp Sustainabil, Appl Econ, Brussels, Belgium
来源
ARGUMENTA OECONOMICA | 2009年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
virtual organizations; temporary ICT mediated networks; relational constructionism; boundary blurring; dilemmas; career characteristics; leadership; TRUST;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The present study investigated the virtual organization model from a relational constructionist perspective. Since the beginning of the nineties, virtual organizations are applauded as the most economically efficient organizational structure to confront the challenges of increasing global competition and environmental complexity. However, when looking at this new organizational activity from a relational constructionist perspective, several critical questions and dilemmas emerge that go unnoticed in the literature. At the same time, in real life 'Open Innovation' cases, the possibilities and boundaries of virtual organizing are also becoming clearer. Compared to classical organizing, virtual organizing makes different demands on managing interdependencies, collaboration, communication. leadership and evaluation, decision making, loyalty and identification with the company. This article inquires into the processes and effects of boundary blurring: dilemmas and challenges concerning trust, loyalty and identity/identification; critical career elements and inclusion/exclusion mechanism: and the role of the leader/facilitator as convener. The main purpose is to develop a new research agenda by raising specific questions concerning the relational side of virtual organizing and related new forms of organization.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 81
页数:27
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
AHMED NU, 2008, J MANAGEMENT ENTERPR, V5, P541
[2]   What is the right organization design? [J].
Anand, N. ;
Daft, Richard L. .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 2007, 36 (04) :329-344
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, CHANGE PRINCIPLES PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SENSMAKING ORG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OPEN INNOVATION RES
[6]  
Argyris C., 1996, Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice, V2
[7]   Double-Loop Learning, Teaching, and Research [J].
Argyris, Chris .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2002, 1 (02) :206-218
[8]  
Ashkenas R., 1995, BOUNDARYLESS ORG
[9]   Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management [J].
Bouwen, R ;
Taillieu, T .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :137-153
[10]  
Bouwen R., 1998, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V7, P299, DOI [10.1080/135943298398727, DOI 10.1080/135943298398727]