A framework for mission-oriented innovation policy: Alternative pathways through the problem-solution space

被引:167
作者
Wanzenbock, Iris [1 ]
Wesseling, Joeri H. [1 ]
Frenken, Koen [1 ]
Hekkert, Marko P. [1 ]
Weber, K. Matthias [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Innovat Studies, Princetonlaan 8A, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] AIT Austrian Inst Technol, Ctr Innovat Syst & Policy, Vienna, Austria
[3] Univ Gustave Eiffel, Lab Interdisciplinaire Sci, Innovat, Soc LISIS, Marne La Vallee, France
关键词
mission-oriented policy; wicked problems; mission; societal challenges; innovation policy; transition; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; GRAND CHALLENGES; NEXT-GENERATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; TRANSITION; SCIENCE; AGRICULTURE; GOVERNANCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scaa027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We aim for a better conceptualization of mission-oriented innovation policy (MIP). Our starting point is an analytical decomposition of societal problems and innovative solutions based on three dimensions of wickedness: (1) contestation; (2) complexity; and (3) uncertainty. We argue that both problems and solutions can be divergent (contested, complex, and uncertain) or convergent (uncontested, well-defined, and informed). Based on the resulting problem-solution typology, we suggest a process-oriented view on MIP and discuss three alternative pathways along which convergence between problems and solutions can be achieved to come from wicked problems to legitimate solutions. We illustrate these pathways using examples for different societal problems related to health (smoking bans), security (CCTV), and energy (wind turbines). For policy makers, locating a societal challenge in this problem-solution space, and implementing policy strategies to achieve problem and solution convergence, is expected to accelerate both the legitimacy of a mission and the resulting solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 489
页数:16
相关论文
共 121 条
[1]   Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework [J].
Alford, John ;
Head, Brian W. .
POLICY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 36 (03) :397-413
[2]   Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? [J].
Alkemade, Floortje ;
Hekkert, Marko P. ;
Negro, Simona O. .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2011, 1 (01) :125-129
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, CBS STATLINE
[4]  
[Anonymous], RES POLICY, V41, P1037
[5]   Tobacco control in Europe: a policy review [J].
Bertollini, Roberto ;
Ribeiro, Sofia ;
Mauer-Stender, Kristina ;
Galea, Gauden .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY REVIEW, 2016, 25 (140) :151-157
[6]   Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis [J].
Bobbink, R. ;
Hicks, K. ;
Galloway, J. ;
Spranger, T. ;
Alkemade, R. ;
Ashmore, M. ;
Bustamante, M. ;
Cinderby, S. ;
Davidson, E. ;
Dentener, F. ;
Emmett, B. ;
Erisman, J. -W. ;
Fenn, M. ;
Gilliam, F. ;
Nordin, A. ;
Pardo, L. ;
De Vries, W. .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2010, 20 (01) :30-59
[7]  
Boekholt P., 2010, THEORY PRACTICE INNO, P333, DOI DOI 10.4337/9781849804424.00022
[8]   Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy [J].
Boon, Wouter ;
Edler, Jakob .
SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2018, 45 (04) :435-447
[9]  
Borras S., 2014, GOVERNANCE SOCIOTECH, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4337/9781784710194.00010, 10.4337/9781784710194.00010]
[10]   The choice of innovation policy instruments [J].
Borras, Susana ;
Edquist, Charles .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (08) :1513-1522