Finite Element Stress Analysis of Dental Prostheses Supported by Straight and Angled Implants

被引:4
作者
Cruz, Mauro [1 ,2 ]
Wassall, Thomaz [2 ]
Toledo, Elson Magalhaes [3 ,4 ]
da Silva Barra, Luis Paulo [4 ]
Cruz, Silvia [1 ]
机构
[1] Clin Ctr Res Stomatol, Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
[2] Sao Leopoldo Mand Res Ctr, Sch Dent, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[3] Natl Lab Sci Comp, Petropolis, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora, Sch Engn, Juiz De Fora, MG, Brazil
关键词
angled implants; dental implants; dental prosthesis; finite element analysis; offset implants; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; EDENTULOUS JAWS; IN-VIVO; BONE; OFFSET; VALIDATION; PLACEMENT; QUALITY; MODEL; TOOTH;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: A three-dimensional finite element analysis was conducted to evaluate and compare the stress distribution around two prosthesis-implant systems, in which implants were arranged in either a straight-line or an intrabone offset configuration. Materials and Methods: The systems were modeled with three titanium implants placed in the posterior mandible following a straight line along the bone. The straight system was built with three straight implants (no offset). The angled system was built as follows: the first implant (mesial) was an angled implant inclined lingually, the second (median) was straight, and the third (distal) was another angled implant inclined buccally. This buccal incline created an intrabone implant offset owing to the inclination of the angled implants' bodies. Each system received a metal-ceramic prosthesis with crowns that mimicked premolar anatomy. In both systems, an axial load of 100 N and a horizontal load of 20 N were applied on the center of the crown of the middle implant. Results: In both systems, the major von Mises stresses occurred with vertical loading on the mesial and the distal neck area of the first and third implants, respectively: 6.304 MPa on the first implant of the straight system and 6.173 MPa on the third implant in the angled system. The peak stress occurred for the minimum principal stress (S3) on the neck of the first implant for both systems at the level of -8.835 MPa for the straight system and -8.511 MPa for the angled system. There was no stress concentration on the inner or outer angles of the angled implants, on the notches along the implant body, or on any apex. Conclusions: In this analysis, the angled system did not induce a stress concentration in any point around the implants that was different from that of the straight system. The stress distribution was very similar in both systems. INT J ORAL MAXILLOFAC IMPLANTS 2009;24:391-403
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 403
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW [J].
ADELL, R ;
LEKHOLM, U ;
ROCKLER, B ;
BRANEMARK, PI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06) :387-416
[2]  
Akça K, 2001, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V16, P722
[3]  
ASH MM, 2003, WHEELERS DENT ANATOM, P194
[4]  
Attard Nikolai, 2002, J Can Dent Assoc, V68, P118
[5]  
Baiamonte T, 1996, J Oral Implantol, V22, P104
[6]   3-DIMENSIONAL STRESS-DISTRIBUTION AROUND A DENTAL IMPLANT AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF INTERFACE DEVELOPMENT [J].
BORCHERS, L ;
REICHART, P .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1983, 62 (02) :155-159
[7]  
Branemark P.-I., 1997, Osseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement: Second International Workshop on Osseointegration in Skeletal Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Rancho Santa Fe, California, October 27-29, 1994
[8]   RECONSTRUCTION OF DEFECTIVE MANDIBLE [J].
BRANEMARK, PI ;
LINDSTROM, J ;
HALLEN, O ;
BREINE, U ;
JEPPSON, PH ;
OHMAN, A .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 1975, 9 (02) :116-128
[9]  
BRANEMARK PI, 1985, THESIS OSSEOINTEGRAT
[10]  
Çaglar A, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P36