Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:32
作者
Noble, Meredith [1 ,2 ]
Bruening, Wendy [1 ,2 ]
Uhl, Stacey [1 ,2 ]
Schoelles, Karen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] ECRI Inst, Evidence Based Practice Ctr, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 USA
[2] Hlth Technol Assessment Grp, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 USA
关键词
Computer-aided detection (CAD); Mammography; Screening; Sensitivity and specificity; Incremental diagnoses; Breast cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-008-0841-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Mammography is generally accepted as the best available breast cancer screening method; however, some cancers detectable on mammography images are missed. Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems for mammography are intended to reduce false negatives by marking suspicious areas of the mammograms for reviewers to consider. Although the prospect of improving the sensitivity of screening mammograms has led to the diffusion of CAD for mammography, little is known about its diagnostic accuracy. To assess the diagnostic performance of CAD for screening mammography in terms of sensitivity and specificity and incremental recall, biopsy, and cancer diagnosis rates. Published literature identified by systematic literature searches of 17 databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, searched through 25 September 2008. A reviewer and an information specialist selected full-length English-language articles that enrolled asymptomatic women for routine breast cancer screening and provided data needed for our analyses using criteria established a priori. We identified 75 potentially relevant publications, of which 7 (9%) were included. Data were extracted and internal validity was assessed by a single review author, and forms were approved by the co-authors. Three studies (n = 347,324) reported sensitivity and specificity, or data to calculate them, and five studies (n = 51,162) reported data to calculate incremental rates of cancer diagnoses and recall and biopsy of women who did not have breast cancer. The pooled sensitivity was 86.0% (95% CI 84.2-87.6%) and specificity was 88.2% (95% CI 88.1-88.3%). Of the 100,000 women screened, CAD yielded an additional 50 (95% CI 30-80) correct breast cancer diagnoses, 1,190 (95% CI 1,090-1,290) recalls of healthy women, and 80 (95% CI 60-100) biopsies of healthy women. A total of 96% (95% CI 93.9-97.3%) of women recalled based upon CAD and 65.1% (95% CI 52.3-76.0%) of women biopsied based upon CAD were healthy. No studies reported patient-oriented clinical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 890
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography [J].
Georgian-Smith, Dianne ;
Moore, Richard H. ;
Halpern, Elkan ;
Yeh, Eren D. ;
Rafferty, Elizabeth A. ;
D'Alessandro, Helen Anne ;
Staffa, Mary ;
Hall, Deborah A. ;
McCarthy, Kathleen A. ;
Kopans, Daniel B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (05) :1135-1141
[12]   Single reading with computer-aided detection for screening mammography [J].
Gilbert, Fiona J. ;
Astley, Susan M. ;
Gillan, Maureen G. C. ;
Agbaje, Olorunsola F. ;
Wallis, Matthew G. ;
James, Jonathan ;
Boggis, Caroline R. M. ;
Duffy, Stephen W. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 359 (16) :1675-1684
[13]   Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: Review of 231,221 mammograms [J].
Gromet, Matthew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :854-859
[14]   Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system [J].
Gur, D ;
Sumkin, JH ;
Rockette, HE ;
Ganott, M ;
Hakim, C ;
Hardesty, L ;
Poller, WR ;
Shah, R ;
Wallace, L .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (03) :185-190
[15]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[16]   Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) :1539-1558
[17]   Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography [J].
Ko, Justin M. ;
Nicholas, Michael J. ;
Mendel, Jeffrey B. ;
Slanetz, Priscilla J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (06) :1483-1491
[18]   Improving the detection of cancer in the screening of mammograms [J].
Laming, D ;
Warren, R .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2000, 7 (01) :24-30
[19]   Screening mammograms: Interpretation with computer-aided detection - Prospective evaluation [J].
Morton, MJ ;
Whaley, DH ;
Brandt, KR ;
Amrami, KK .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (02) :375-383
[20]  
Olkin I, 1999, STAT MED, V18, P2331, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990915/30)18:17/18<2331::AID-SIM259>3.0.CO