Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined heat and power generation system

被引:101
作者
Lee, Young Duk [1 ,2 ]
Ahn, Kook Young [2 ]
Morosuk, Tatiana [1 ]
Tsatsaronis, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Inst Energy Engn, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
[2] KIMM, Taejon 305343, South Korea
关键词
SOFC; Exergy; Exergetic analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; Cost effectiveness; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; CATALYTIC COMBUSTOR; COUPLED REACTOR; STEAM REFORMER; CYCLE; ENERGY; PLANT; CHP; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.066
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluations have been carried out for a 100 kW-class solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined heat and power generation system, to find out the measures that would improve its efficiency, and, more importantly, its cost effectiveness. The exergoeconomic analysis is an appropriate combination of an exergetic analysis and an economic analysis; through exergoeconomics, we obtain the real cost associated with each stream and with the inefficiencies within each component in a system. For the analyses, the exergies of fuel and the exergies of product for all components have been defined. Subsequently, the exergetic efficiency of each component has been evaluated. By combining the results obtained from an economic analysis with the results of the exergetic analysis, the cost structure of the overall system has been figured out. The components, showing higher exergoeconomic factors such as SOFC stack, fuel blower, heat recovery water pump, and inverter, need reduction of investment cost, even if the associated efficiency would decreased because of this cost reduction. For the components, exhibiting lower exergoeconomic factors such as integrated reformer, fuel/water pre-heater, and air pre-heater, the main focus, should be on efficiency improvements, even if higher investment expenditures would be associated with such improvements. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 164
页数:11
相关论文
共 75 条
[21]  
DOE/NETL, 2007, IMP SCAL PROD VOL SO
[22]   Computer simulation of a biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell power system using Aspen Plus [J].
Doherty, Wayne ;
Reynolds, Anthony ;
Kennedy, David .
ENERGY, 2010, 35 (12) :4545-4555
[23]   On the systematic optimization of ethanol fed SOFC-based electricity generating systems in terms of energy and exergy [J].
Douvartzides, SL ;
Coutelieris, FA ;
Tsiakaras, PE .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2003, 114 (02) :203-212
[24]   Exergy analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell power plant fed by either ethanol or methane [J].
Douvarzides, S ;
Coutelieris, F ;
Tsiakaras, P .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2004, 131 (1-2) :224-230
[25]   Exergy analysis of a gas-turbine combined-cycle power plant with precombustion CO2 capture [J].
Ertesvåg, IS ;
Kvamsdal, HM ;
Bolland, O .
ENERGY, 2005, 30 (01) :5-39
[26]   Exergoeconomic analysis of double effect absorption refrigeration systems [J].
Farshi, L. Garousi ;
Mahmoudi, S. M. S. ;
Rosen, M. A. ;
Yari, M. ;
Amidpour, Majid .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 65 :13-25
[27]  
Fen He, 2002, EXERGYAN INT J, V2, P105
[28]  
Foger K, 2010, P EUR SOL OX FUEL CE
[29]   Thermoeconomic analysis of pressurized hybrid SOFC systems with CO2 separation [J].
Franzoni, A. ;
Magistri, L. ;
Traverso, A. ;
Massardo, A. F. .
ENERGY, 2008, 33 (02) :311-320
[30]  
Frnagopolous CA, 1991, INT J ENERGY ENV EC, V1, P275