Blended learning versus face-to-face learning in an undergraduate nursing health assessment course: A quasi-experimental study

被引:52
作者
Berga, Keri-Ann [1 ,2 ]
Vadnais, Elisha [3 ]
Nelson, Jody [2 ]
Johnston, Sharon [2 ]
Buro, Karen [4 ]
Hu, Rui [4 ]
Olaiya, Bo [5 ]
机构
[1] Champlain Maternal Newborn Reg Program CMNRP, 2305 St Laurent Blvd,Suite 300A, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] MacEwan Univ, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Coll & Assoc Registered Nurses Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[4] MacEwan Univ, Dept Math & Stat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[5] Simon Fraser Univ, Burnaby, BC, Canada
关键词
Blended learning; Teaching methods; Undergraduate; Self-efficacy; Students; nursing; Education; baccalaureate; CLINICAL SKILLS; SELF-EFFICACY; COMMUNICATION MODULE; STUDENTS; ONLINE; SATISFACTION; INSTRUCTION; EXPERIENCE; RESOURCES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104622
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Blended learning, which integrates face-to-face and online instruction, is increasingly being adopted. A gap remains in the literature related to blended learning, self-efficacy, knowledge and perceptions in undergraduate nursing. Objectives: To investigate outcomes of self-efficacy, knowledge and perceptions related to the implementation of a newly blended course. Design: This was a quasi-experimental pre-post test design. Setting: This study was conducted at an undergraduate university in Alberta, Canada. Participants: A total of 217 second-year undergraduate nursing students participated and 187 participants completed all study components. Methods: A convenience sampling method was used. Data were collected at the start and end of the semesters. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics using R(3.4.3) and R-Studio(1.1.423). Results: There were no significant differences in self-efficacy scores between groups or in the pre-post surveys (p > 0.100) over time. There was no significant difference in knowledge between the blended online and faceto-face groups (p > 0.100). For students in the blended course, perceptions of the online learning environment were positive. Conclusion: Blended learning has the potential to foster innovative and flexible learning opportunities. This study supports continued use and evaluation of blended learning as a pedagogical approach.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
A Bandura, 2006, Self-efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, V5, P307
[2]   Registered Nurses' Thoughts on Blended Learning in a Postgraduate Course in Cancer care-Content Analyses of Web Surveys and a Focus Group Interview [J].
Arving, Cecilia ;
Wadensten, Barbro ;
Johansson, Birgitta .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2014, 29 (02) :278-283
[3]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[4]   Blended Learning Versus Traditional Lecture in Introductory Nursing Pathophysiology Courses [J].
Blissitt, Andrea Marie .
JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2016, 55 (04) :227-230
[5]  
Chang CC, 2003, ACAD STUD ASIAN ECON, P1
[6]  
Chang V., 1999, P W AUSTR I ED RES F
[7]   Investigation of blended learning video resources to teach health students clinical skills: An integrative review [J].
Coyne, Elisabeth ;
Rands, Hazel ;
Frommolt, Valda ;
Kain, Victoria ;
Plugge, Melanie ;
Mitchell, Marion .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2018, 63 :101-107
[8]   Patient Navigation in Oncology Nursing: An Innovative Blended Learning Model [J].
Crawford, Joanne ;
Brudnoy, Liat ;
Soong, Tracy ;
Graham, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2013, 44 (10) :461-469
[9]   Evaluation of a blended learning model in geriatric medicine: A successful learning experience for medical students [J].
Duque, Gustavo ;
Demontiero, Oddom ;
Whereat, Sarah ;
Gunawardene, Piumali ;
Leung, Oliver ;
Webster, Peter ;
Sardinha, Luis ;
Boersma, Derek ;
Sharma, Anita .
AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2013, 32 (02) :103-109
[10]   The Impact of Blended Teaching on Knowledge, Satisfaction, and Self-Directed Learning in Nursing Undergraduates: A Randomized, Controlled Trial [J].
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Gagnon, Johanne ;
Desmartis, Marie ;
Njoya, Merlin .
NURSING EDUCATION PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 34 (06) :377-382