Genetic changes at specific stages of breast cancer progression detected by comparative genomic hybridization

被引:41
|
作者
Gao, Yuxia [1 ]
Niu, Yun [1 ]
Wang, Xiaowei [2 ]
Wei, Li [1 ,3 ]
Lu, Song [4 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Breast Canc Res Key Lab Natl, Educ Minist, Canc Inst & Hosp, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Natl Human Genome Ctr, Mol Cytogenet Lab, Beijing 100176, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Lab Kidney Physician Dept, Tianjin 300052, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Biochem, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM | 2009年 / 87卷 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast; Breast cancer progression; Chromosome; Comparative genomic hybridization; Molecular cytogenetics; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; CHROMOSOMAL ALTERATIONS; 20Q13.2; AMPLIFICATION; MOLECULAR-GENETICS; ALLELIC LOSS; 20Q GAIN; HYPERPLASIA; IMMORTALIZATION; HETEROZYGOSITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00109-008-0408-1
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Although a simple linear progression model for breast cancer has already been proposed, its validity still remains controversial. Especially, the genetic and molecular features of breast cancer at different stages during the development and progression, as well as their relationship, have rarely been studied under the same experimental conditions simultaneously. According to these limitations in this research area, the current study applied comparative genomic hybridization technique to investigate genomic changes in 15 cases of breast atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 15 cases of ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 15 cases of invasive ductal carcinomas (IDC) and the relationship among the genetic changes. Thirty commonly altered regions that were identified included known (gains of 1q, 8q, 17q, 20q, Xq and losses of 8p, 13q, 16q, 17p, 22q) and several uncharacterized (gains of 2q, 5p, 10p, 12q, 16p, 18q, etc. and losses of 11p13-pter, 11q, 14q, Xp, etc). The overall frequency of copy number losses was higher in IDC than that in DCIS (P=0.013). ADH showed more frequent gain of 17q than that in IDC (P=0.007), and IDC exhibited a higher frequency for the loss of 22q than that in ADH (P=0.018). On one hand, several common genomic changes shared by ADH, DCIS, and IDC make a linear relationship for these three lesions possible. On the other hand, the heterogeneity has also showed clonal diversification and different pathways of breast cancer progression. The regions of chromosomal copy number alterations may bring new insights into the strategy for tumor progression blocking and the discovery of new potential targets for breast cancer treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 152
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
    Doebar, S. C.
    Krol, N. M.
    van Marion, R.
    Brouwer, R. W. W.
    van Ijcken, W. F. J.
    Martens, J. M.
    Dinjens, W. N. M.
    van Deurzen, C. H. M.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2019, 474 (02) : 247 - 251
  • [42] Array comparative genomic hybridization analysis of products of conception in recurrent pregnancy loss for specific anomalies detected by USG
    Gajjar, Kinjal
    Patel, Alpesh
    Patel, B., I
    Chettiar, Shiva
    Jhala, Devendrasinh
    REPRODUCTION AND FERTILITY, 2023, 4 (02):
  • [43] Progression of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive breast cancer: comparative genomic sequencing
    S. C. Doebar
    N. M. Krol
    R. van Marion
    R. W. W. Brouwer
    W. F. J. van Ijcken
    J. M. Martens
    W. N. M. Dinjens
    C. H. M. van Deurzen
    Virchows Archiv, 2019, 474 : 247 - 251
  • [44] Chromosomal imbalances in primary oligodendroglial tumors and their recurrences: clues about malignant progression detected using comparative genomic hybridization
    Jeuken, JWM
    Sprenger, SHE
    Vermeer, E
    Kappelle, AC
    Boerman, RH
    Wesseling, P
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 96 (03) : 559 - 564
  • [45] Genome-wide screening for genomic aberrations in Kazakh patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer by comparative genomic hybridization
    Cui, Xiao-Bin
    Tian, Yan-Xia
    Chun, Cai-Pu
    Peng, Hao
    Liu, Chun-Xia
    Yang, Lan
    Hu, Jian-Ming
    Xin, Hua-Hua
    Chen, Xi
    Wang, Ning
    Wei, Yu-Tao
    Yin, Lai-Bo
    Chen, Yun-Zhao
    Li, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 11 (01): : 427 - 437
  • [46] Genomic profiling by array comparative genomic hybridization reveals novel DNA copy number changes in breast phyllodes tumours
    Kuijper, Arno
    Snijders, Antoine M.
    Berns, Els M. J. J.
    Kuenen-Boumeester, Vibeke
    van der Wall, Elsken
    Albertson, Donna G.
    van Diest, Paul J.
    CELLULAR ONCOLOGY, 2009, 31 (01) : 31 - 39
  • [47] High resolution genomic analysis of sporadic breast cancer using array-based comparative genomic hybridization
    Tara L Naylor
    Joel Greshock
    Yan Wang
    Theresa Colligon
    QC Yu
    Virginia Clemmer
    Tal Z Zaks
    Barbara L Weber
    Breast Cancer Research, 7
  • [48] Discovery of over-expressed genes and genetic alterations in breast cancer cells using a combination of suppression subtractive hybridization, multiplex FISH and comparative genomic hybridization
    Xie, D
    Jauch, A
    Miller, CW
    Bartram, CR
    Koeffler, HP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 21 (03) : 499 - 507
  • [49] Comparative genomic hybridization reveals genetic progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma from dysplasia via two different tumourigenic pathways
    Noutomi, Y.
    Oga, A.
    Uchida, K.
    Okafuji, M.
    Ita, M.
    Kawauchi, S.
    Furuya, T.
    Ueyama, Y.
    Sasaki, K.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2006, 210 (01) : 67 - 74
  • [50] Consistent and Differential Genetic Aberrations between Esophageal Dysplasia and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Detected By Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
    Shi, Zhi-Zhou
    Shang, Li
    Jiang, Yan-Yi
    Hao, Jia-Jie
    Zhang, Yu
    Zhang, Tong-Tong
    Lin, De-Chen
    Liu, Shu-Guang
    Wang, Bo-Shi
    Gong, Ting
    Zhan, Qi-Min
    Wang, Ming-Rong
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (21) : 5867 - 5878