Safety of one method of sputum induction in asthmatic subjects

被引:87
作者
Wong, HH
Fahy, JV
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,DEPT MED,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,CARDIOVASC RES INST,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
关键词
D O I
10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9610114
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
To assess the safety of sputum induction in asthmatic subjects, we conducted a retrospective review of data from 351 sputum inductions in 78 subjects from our institution. The sputum induction protocol consisted of baseline FEV1, pretreatment with albuterol 180 mu g, postbronchodilator spirometry 15 min later, the induction procedure itself (inhalation of 3% saline for 20 min), and postsputum induction spirometry. We found that sputum induction was usually well tolerated, although some subjects developed wheeze and dyspnea. Overall, 11 of the 78 subjects (14%) had a fall in FEV1 of greater than or equal to 20% from the postbronchodilator baseline (''excessive bronchoconstriction'') during their first sputum induction (range: -20 to -69%); no subject developed refractory bronchoconstriction requiring hospitalization or emergency room treatment. Only one of the 54 subjects (1.9%) with a baseline prebronchodilator FEV1 > 80% had excessive bronchoconstriction, whereas 10 of the 24 subjects (42%) whose baseline FEV1 was less than or equal to 80% predicted did so. The change in FEV1 during sputum induction was significantly correlated with the baseline prebronchodilator FEV1% predicted, the baseline postbronchodilator FEV1% predicted, the PC20 for methacholine, and the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. We conclude that 180 mu g albuterol does not prevent excessive bronchoconstriction in all asthmatic subjects undergoing sputum induction, especially in asthmatic subjects with a low baseline FEV1. Pulmonary function should be monitored regularly during sputum induction in asthmatic subjects to monitor for excessive bronchoconstriction.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Anderson SD, 1995, PROVOCATION CHALLENG, P249
[2]   COMPARATIVE BRONCHIAL RESPONSES TO HYPEROSMOLAR SALINE AND METHACHOLINE IN ASTHMA [J].
BOULET, LP ;
LEGRIS, C ;
THIBAULT, L ;
TURCOTTE, H .
THORAX, 1987, 42 (12) :953-958
[3]   STANDARDIZATION OF BRONCHIAL INHALATION CHALLENGE PROCEDURES [J].
CHAI, H ;
FARR, RS ;
FROEHLICH, LA ;
MATHISON, DA ;
MCLEAN, JA ;
ROSENTHAL, RR ;
SHEFFER, AL ;
SPECTOR, SL ;
TOWNLEY, RG .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1975, 56 (04) :323-327
[4]   ANALYSIS OF INDUCED SPUTUM TO EXAMINE THE EFFECTS OF PREDNISONE ON AIRWAY INFLAMMATION IN ASTHMATIC SUBJECTS [J].
CLAMAN, DM ;
BOUSHEY, HA ;
LIU, J ;
WONG, H ;
FAHY, JV .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1994, 94 (05) :861-869
[5]   DISASSOCIATION OF THE RELEASE OF HISTAMINE AND ARACHIDONIC-ACID METABOLITES FROM OSMOTICALLY ACTIVATED BASOPHILS AND HUMAN LUNG MAST-CELLS [J].
EGGLESTON, PA ;
KAGEYSOBOTKA, A ;
PROUD, D ;
ADKINSON, NF ;
LICHTENSTEIN, LM .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1990, 141 (04) :960-964
[6]  
FABY JV, 1992, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V146, P1430
[7]   CELLULAR AND BIOCHEMICAL-ANALYSIS OF INDUCED SPUTUM FROM ASTHMATIC AND FROM HEALTHY-SUBJECTS [J].
FAHY, JV ;
LIU, J ;
WONG, H ;
BOUSHEY, HA .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1993, 147 (05) :1126-1131
[8]   NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF BRONCHIAL INFLAMMATION IN ASTHMA - NO CORRELATION BETWEEN EOSINOPHILIA OF INDUCED SPUTUM AND BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS TO INHALED HYPERTONIC SALINE [J].
IREDALE, MJ ;
WANKLYN, SAR ;
PHILLIPS, IP ;
KRAUSZ, T ;
IND, PW .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 1994, 24 (10) :940-945
[9]   Differences in interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in induced sputum from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma [J].
Keatings, VM ;
Collins, PD ;
Scott, DM ;
Barnes, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 153 (02) :530-534
[10]  
KIPS JC, 1997, IN PRESS EUR RESPIR