LONG-TERM TOXICITY FOLLOWING 3D CONFORMAL RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER FROM THE RTOG 9406 PHASE I/II DOSE ESCALATION STUDY

被引:77
作者
Michalski, Jeff M. [1 ]
Bae, Kyounghwa [2 ]
Roach, Mack [3 ]
Markoe, Arnold M. [4 ]
Sandler, Howard M. [5 ]
Ryu, Janice [6 ]
Parliament, Matthew B. [7 ]
Straube, William [8 ]
Valicenti, Richard K. [9 ]
Cox, James D. [10 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Radiat Therapy Oncol Grp, Dept Stat, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Miami, Miami, FL USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[7] Univ Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[8] Image Guided Therapy Ctr, St Louis, MO USA
[9] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[10] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2010年 / 76卷 / 01期
关键词
INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIOTHERAPY; 3-DIMENSIONAL RADIOTHERAPY; ALPHA/BETA; TRIAL; GY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.062
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To update the incidence of late toxicity of RTOG 9406, a three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) dose escalation trial for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: A total of 1,084 men were registered to this Phase I/II trial of 3DCRT (eligible patients, 1,055). The dose for level I was 68.4 Gy; 73.8 Gy for level II; 79.2 Gy for level III; 74 Gy for level IV; and 78 Gy for level V. Patients in levels I to III received 1.8 Gy/fraction, and those in levels IV to V received 2.0 Gy/fraction. Disease group I patients were treated at the prostate only, group 2 patients were treated at the prostate and at the seminal vesicles with a prostate boost, and group 3 patients were treated at the prostate and seminal vesicles. The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 6.1 y (level V) to 1.2.1 y (level I). Results: The incidence rates of RTOG grade 3 or less gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity were 3%, 4%, 6%, 7%, and 9% in group 1 and 6%, 2%, 6%, 9%, and 12% in group 2 at dose levels of I, II, III, IV, and V, respectively. In group 1, level V patients had a higher probability of grade2 late or greater gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity than those in levels I, II, and III (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.93, p = 0.0101; HR = 2.29, p = 0.0007; HR = 2.52, p = 0.0002, respectively). In group 2, dose level V patients had a higher probability of grade 2 or greater late gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity than those in dose levels II, III, and IV (HR = 2.61, p = 0.0002; HR = 2.22, p = 0.0051; HR = 1.60, p = 0.0276, respectively). Conclusions: Tolerance to high-dose 3DCRT remains excellent. There is significantly more grade 2 or greater toxicity with a dose of 78 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction than with 68.4 Gy to 79.2 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction and with 74 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 50 ICRU MEAS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, AJCC CANC STAGING MA
[3]  
Bonferroni C., 1936, Pubblicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze, V8, P3, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781412961288.N455
[4]   Fractionation and protraction for radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Hall, EJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (05) :1095-1101
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]   Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial [J].
Dearnaley, David P. ;
Sydes, Matthew R. ;
Graham, John D. ;
Aird, Edwin G. ;
Bottomley, David ;
Cowan, Richard A. ;
Huddart, Robert A. ;
Jose, Chakiath C. ;
Matthews, John H. L. ;
Millar, Jeremy ;
Moore, A. Rollo ;
Morgan, Rachel C. ;
Russell, J. Martin ;
Scrase, Christopher D. ;
Stephens, Richard J. ;
Syndikus, Isabel ;
Parmar, Mahesh K. B. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2007, 8 (06) :475-487
[7]   INDICATIONS FOR AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SEMINAL-VESICLE IRRADIATION DURING 3D CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
DIAZ, A ;
ROACH, M ;
MARQUEZ, C ;
COLEMAN, L ;
PICKETT, B ;
WOLFE, JS ;
CARROLL, P ;
NARAYAN, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 30 (02) :323-329
[8]   Is α/β for prostate tumors really low? [J].
Fowler, J ;
Chappell, R ;
Ritter, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (04) :1021-1031
[9]   A simple analytic derivation suggests that prostate cancer α/β ratio is low [J].
King, CR ;
Fowler, JF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 51 (01) :213-214
[10]   Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer [J].
Kuban, Deborah A. ;
Tucker, Susan L. ;
Dong, Lei ;
Starkschall, George ;
Huang, Eugene E. ;
Cheung, M. Rex ;
Lee, Andrew K. ;
Pollack, Alan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 70 (01) :67-74