Introductory overview: Error metrics for hydrologic modelling - A review of common practices and an open source library to facilitate use and adoption

被引:113
作者
Jackson, Elise K. [1 ]
Roberts, Wade [1 ]
Nelsen, Benjamin [1 ]
Williams, Gustavious P. [1 ]
Nelson, E. James [1 ]
Ames, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
Hydrology model error; Model evaluation; Model accuracy; Predicted versus observed; MEAN SQUARED ERROR; ACCURACY; ASYMMETRY; ENSEMBLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.05.001
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Error metrics quantify predicted flow accuracy and compare different predictions. Hydrologists commonly use and report metrics with little justification or discussion of the selected metric or metric strengths and weaknesses. Metric selection requires clear objectives, as different metrics are sensitive to different bias or error types. We review over 60 different error metrics along with various common modifications. We provide a brief metric description of these metrics and a more in-depth discussion of metrics often reported in hydrological literature. We recommend that multiple metrics be used to evaluate model accuracy. We present the open source HydroErr library, implemented in Python and MATLAB (R), which contains the error metric functions reported here to facilitate greater use of these metrics and encourage metric exploration related to relative metric strengths and weaknesses. We demonstrate the library with short case studies and provide a supplement with additional detail.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 48
页数:17
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1969, COMP STUDY TIME SERI
[2]   ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
COLLOPY, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :69-80
[3]   FEATURED COLLECTION INTRODUCTION: OPEN WATER DATA INITIATIVE [J].
Bales, Jerad .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2016, 52 (04) :811-815
[4]   A GENERALIZATION OF COHEN KAPPA AGREEMENT MEASURE TO INTERVAL MEASUREMENT AND MULTIPLE RATERS [J].
BERRY, KJ ;
MIELKE, PW .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1988, 48 (04) :921-933
[5]  
Coleman C.D., 2007, J Econ Soc Meas, V32, P219, DOI [10.3233/JEM-2007-0290, DOI 10.3233/JEM-2007-0290]
[6]   Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals [J].
Criss, Robert E. ;
Winston, William E. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2008, 22 (14) :2723-2725
[7]   Alternative data-driven methods to estimate wind from waves by inverse modeling [J].
Daga, Mansi ;
Deo, M. C. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2009, 49 (02) :293-310
[8]  
Fisher RA, 1919, MON NOT R ASTRON SOC, V80, P0758
[9]   A PRAGMATIC VIEW OF ACCURACY MEASUREMENT IN FORECASTING [J].
FLORES, BE .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 14 (02) :93-98
[10]   On the asymmetry of the symmetric MAPE [J].
Goodwin, P ;
Lawton, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1999, 15 (04) :405-408