The Special Problem of Interpretation in the Treatment of Traumatized Patients

被引:17
作者
Bohleber, Werner [1 ,2 ]
Leuzinger-Bohleber, Marianne [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] German Psychoanalyt Assoc DPV, Berlin, Germany
[2] IPA Comm Conceptual Integrat, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Sigmund Freud Inst Psychoanal, Myliusstr 20, D-60323 Frankfurt, Germany
[4] German Psychoanalyt Assoc, Kassel, Germany
[5] Univ Kassel, Psychoanal, Kassel, Germany
[6] IPA, Res Board, London, England
关键词
PSYCHIC TRAUMA; PSYCHOANALYSIS; OBJECT;
D O I
10.1080/07351690.2016.1112223
中图分类号
B84-0 [心理学理论];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
Trauma is not an unambiguously defined concept. After a discussion of various definitions and different types of trauma, a description is given of short- and long-term outcomes of traumatic experiences. For the treatment of traumatized individuals, and above all, for the interpretation of this kind of experience it is important to note that traumatic memories are subject to some specific psychic transformations. The traumatized self-states are not completely dissociated from the mind's associative network. Specific interpretive strategies are described that focus on the irreparable break in basic trust, the need to control relationships, the importance of the reconstruction of the trauma, the restoring of the paralyzed agency of the traumatized self, and the particular attention that must be paid to enactments in the treatment. In the final part, a new understanding of memory in so-called Embodied Cognitive Science is described. Memory is no longer a retrieval of stored knowledge in the brain, but a function of the entire organism, the product of complex, dynamic recategorization and invariably embodied interactive processes. By way of a clinical example, the manner is illustrated in which this new conception provides an alternative explanation as to how traumatic memories function, and how the latter are understood in psychoanalytic treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 76
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, BODY SHAPES WAY WE T
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1939, MOSES MONOTHEISM
  • [3] BARANGER M, 1988, INT J PSYCHOANAL, V69, P113
  • [4] Blum H., 1994, RECONSTRUCTION PSYCH
  • [5] Bohleber Werner., 2010, Destructiveness, Intersubjectivity, and Trauma: The Identity Crisis of Modern Psychoanalysis
  • [6] Cooper A.M., 1986, The reconstruction of trauma: Its significance in clinical work, P41
  • [7] Damasio A.R., 1994, Descartes errors: Emotions, reasons, and the human brain
  • [8] Edelman GM, 1987, Neural Darwinism: the theory of neuronal group selection
  • [9] FURST SS, 1978, INT J PSYCHOANAL, V59, P345
  • [10] Gallese V., 2011, Neuropsychoanalysis, V13, P196, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15294145.2011.10773675, 10.1080/15294145.2011.10773675]