Finite Element Analysis of RC Beams by the Discrete Model and CBIS Model Using LS-DYNA

被引:11
|
作者
Yang, Seung H. [1 ]
Woo, Kwang S. [2 ]
Kim, Jeong J. [2 ]
Ahn, Jae S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Disaster Management Res Inst, 365 Jongga Ro, Ulsan 44538, South Korea
[2] Yeungnam Univ, Dept Civil Engn, 280 Daehak Ro, Gyongsan 38541, Gyeonbuk, South Korea
[3] Yeungnam Univ, Sch Gen Educ, 280 Daehak Ro, Gyongsan 38541, Gyeonbuk, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
BEHAVIOR; FLEXURE;
D O I
10.1155/2021/8857491
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There are several techniques to simulate rebar reinforced concrete, such as smeared model, discrete model, embedded model, CLIS (constrained Lagrange in solid) model, and CBIS (constrained beam in solid) model. In this study, however, the interaction between the concrete elements and the reinforcement beam elements is only simulated by the discrete model and CBIS (constrained beam in solid) model. The efficiency and accuracy comparisons are investigated with reference to the analysis results by both models provided by LS-DYNA explicit finite element software. The geometric models are created using LS-PrePost, general purpose preprocessing software for meshing. The meshed models are imported to LS-DYNA where the input files are then analyzed. Winfrith and CSCM concrete material options are employed to describe the concrete damage behavior. The reinforcement material model is capable of isotropic and kinematic hardening plasticity. The load versus midspan deflection curves of the finite element models correlate with those of the experiment. Under the conditions of the same level of accuracy, the CBIS model is evaluated to have the following advantages over the discrete model. First, it has the advantage of reducing the time required for FE modeling; second, saving computer CPU time due to a reduction in total number of nodes; and third, securing a good aspect ratio of concrete elements.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simulation parameter matrix capture and validation of a composite continuous damage model in LS-DYNA
    Sui, Zehuan
    Wang, Fusheng
    Song, Tong
    Zhang, Hanghua
    Chen, Yajun
    POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2025,
  • [42] Forging of Naval Brass (ASTM B 16) - Finite Element Analysis using Ls Dyna
    Sankari, T. Subha
    Sangavi, S.
    Paneerselvam, T.
    Venkatraman, R.
    Venkatesan, M.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING APPLICATIONS (ICONAMMA-2016), 2016, 149
  • [43] Nonlinear finite element analysis of RC and UHPC beams and slabs with a plastic damage material model
    Herbrand, M.
    Kueres, D.
    Stark, A.
    Classen, M.
    BAUINGENIEUR, 2016, 91 : 46 - 56
  • [44] Finite Element Simulation of Axial Creep-Feed Grinding Engineering Ceramics Based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA
    Tian, Xinli
    Li, Fuqiang
    Mao, Yatao
    Zhang, Baoguo
    Wang, Jianquan
    ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-4, 2012, 472-475 : 927 - 931
  • [45] FSI ANALYSIS WITH CONTINUOUS FLUID FLOW USING FEM AND SPH METHODS IN LS-DYNA
    Topalovic, Marko
    Nikolic, Aleksandar
    Vulovic, Snezana
    Milovanovic, Vladimir P.
    JOURNAL OF THE SERBIAN SOCIETY FOR COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2021, 15 (02) : 93 - 100
  • [46] Finite-Element Analysis and Strength Model for IC Debonding in FRP-Strengthened RC Beams
    Li, Xing-Hua
    Wu, Gang
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2018, 22 (05)
  • [47] Finite element analysis of RC beams with and without openings
    Gokul P.
    Sabarigirivasan L.
    Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 68 : 2541 - 2550
  • [48] NUMERICAL FAILURE ANALYSIS OF LAMINATED BEAMS USING A REFINED FINITE ELEMENT MODEL
    Layachi, Maroua
    Khechai, Abdelhak
    Ghrieb, Abderrahmane
    Layachi, Safa
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2023, 23 (01): : 32 - 57
  • [49] Free vibration analysis of delaminated beams using mixed finite element model
    Ramtekkar, G. S.
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2009, 328 (4-5) : 428 - 440
  • [50] Vibration analysis of beams using high-order finite element model
    Wen, Ying
    Zeng, Oing-Yuan
    STRUCTURAL CONDITION ASSESSMENT, MONITORING AND IMPROVEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 224 - 228