What if They Are All High-Risk for Attrition? Correlates of Retention in a Longitudinal Study of Reentry from Prison

被引:45
作者
Clark, Kendra J. [1 ]
Mitchell, Meghan M. [2 ]
Fahmy, Chantal [3 ]
Pyrooz, David C. [1 ]
Decker, Scott H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Orlando, FL 32816 USA
[3] Univ Texas San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Arizona State Univ, Phoenix, AZ USA
关键词
high-risk; longitudinal research; panel studies; reentry; retention; RESPONSE RATES; LIFE-COURSE; FOLLOW-UP; MONETARY INCENTIVES; DESISTANCE; PARTICIPANTS; CRIME; INCARCERATION; TRAJECTORIES; TRANSITIONS;
D O I
10.1177/0306624X20967934
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Longitudinal data are essential to research in criminology and criminal justice. Despite attrition's implications for validity, understanding its sources is underexplored empirically. We examine the correlates of retention using covariates organized into domains of prediction, prevention, and projection. Data from the LoneStar Project, a three-wave longitudinal reentry study of 802 males recently released from prisoners in Texas, were analyzed to examine the correlates of proximal, distal, and any study retention. The best correlates of study retention are prevention techniques used by researchers to reduce attrition. In contrast, only a few covariates traditionally associated with attrition and no covariates used for attrition projection were related to retention. What researchers do matters more for retention than the characteristics of individuals they are trying to retain. The findings underscore how researchers can improve study retention in longitudinal research while also correcting for non-random attrition in current longitudinal data sources.
引用
收藏
页码:1807 / 1842
页数:36
相关论文
共 118 条
[1]  
Abbott O., 2014, HARD TO SURVEY POPUL, P58
[2]  
Alper M., 2018, UPDATE PRISONER RECI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, SMART DECARCERATION
[4]   Response Rates in Organizational Science, 1995-2008: A Meta-analytic Review and Guidelines for Survey Researchers [J].
Anseel, Frederik ;
Lievens, Filip ;
Schollaert, Eveline ;
Choragwicka, Beata .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 25 (03) :335-349
[5]  
Arnold Tom, 2014, DLC CRIMINOLOGIST, V2, P9
[6]   Reducing bias due to systematic attrition in longitudinal studies: The benefits of multiple imputation [J].
Asendorpf, Jens B. ;
van de Schoot, Rens ;
Denissen, Jaap J. A. ;
Hutteman, Roos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 38 (05) :453-460
[7]   How attrition impacts the internal and external validity of longitudinal research [J].
Barry, AE .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2005, 75 (07) :267-270
[8]  
Becker K., 2014, Hard-to-survey populations, P619
[9]  
Bender BG, 2003, ANN ALLERG ASTHMA IM, V91, P168
[10]   Using Facebook to Maximize Follow-Up Response Rates in a Longitudinal Study of Adults Who Use Methamphetamine [J].
Bolanos, Franklin ;
Herbeck, Diane ;
Christou, Dayna ;
Lovinger, Katherine ;
Pham, Aurora ;
Raihan, Adnan ;
Rodriguez, Luz ;
Sheaff, Patricia ;
Brecht, Mary-Lynn .
SUBSTANCE ABUSE-RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2012, 6 :1-11