An investigation of the reproducibility of ultrasound measures of abdominal muscle activation in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

被引:54
作者
Costa, Leonardo Oliveira Pena [1 ]
Maher, Chris G. [1 ]
Latimer, Jane [1 ]
Hodges, Paul W. [2 ]
Shirley, Debra [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, George Inst Int Hlth, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, NHMRC Ctr Clin Res Excellence Spinal Pain Injury, Sch Hlth Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Ultrasound; Abdominal muscles; Reproducibility; Agreement; Reliability; MOTOR CONTROL EXERCISE; TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS; DRAWING-IN; RELIABILITY; THICKNESS; STIFFNESS; STABILIZATION; CONTRACTION; RECRUITMENT; MOVEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-009-1018-5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Ultrasound (US) measures are used by clinicians and researchers to evaluate improvements in activity of the abdominal muscles in patients with low back pain. Studies evaluating the reproducibility of these US measures provide some information; however, little is known about the reproducibility of these US measures over time in patients with low back pain. The objectives of this study were to estimate the reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of automatic activation of the lateral abdominal wall muscles using a leg force task in patients with chronic low back pain. Thirty-five participants from an existing randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial participated in the study. A reproducibility analysis was undertaken from all patients using data collected at baseline and after treatment. The reproducibility of measurements of thickness, muscle activation (thickness changes) and muscle improvement/deterioration after intervention (differences in thickness changes from single images made before and after treatment) was analysed. The reproducibility of static images (thickness) was excellent (ICC2,1 = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.97, standard error of the measurement (SEM) = 0.04 cm, smallest detectable change (SDC) = 0.11 cm), the reproducibility of thickness changes was moderate (ICC2,1 = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65-0.76, SEM = 15%, SDC 41%), while the reproducibility of differences in thickness changes from single images with statistical adjustment for duplicate measures was poor (ICC2,1 = 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.58, SEM = 21%, SDC = 66.5%). Improvements in the testing protocol must be performed in order to enhance reproducibility of US as an outcome measure for abdominal muscle activation.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1065
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*ACSM, 1995, ACSMS GUID EX TEST P
[2]   The response of the transverse abdominis and internal oblique muscles to different postures [J].
Ainscough-Potts, AM ;
Morrissey, MC ;
Critchley, D .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2006, 11 (01) :54-60
[3]  
[Anonymous], BMC MUSCULOSKELET DI, DOI DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-6-54
[4]  
BEAZELL JR, 2006, J MAN MANIP THER, V14, P168
[5]   M-mode ultrasound: a reliable measure of transversus abdominis thickness? [J].
Bunce, SM ;
Moore, AP ;
Hough, AD .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (04) :315-317
[6]   Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible [J].
Chiradejnant, A ;
Maher, CG ;
Latimer, J .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 26 (01) :34-39
[7]  
COSTA LOP, 2009, PHYS THER IN PRESS
[8]  
Critchley DJ., 2002, PHYSIOTHERAPY, V88, P322, DOI [10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60745-6, DOI 10.1016/S0031-9406(05)60745-6]
[9]   When to use agreement versus reliability measures [J].
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) :1033-1039
[10]   Estimating the reliability of a test split into two parts of equal or unequal length [J].
Feldt, LS ;
Charter, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2003, 8 (01) :102-109