Cervical Pessary versus Expectant Management for the Prevention of Delivery Prior to 36 Weeks in Women with Placenta Previa: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:5
作者
Stafford, Irene A. [1 ,2 ]
Garite, Thomas J. [3 ,4 ]
Maurel, Kimberly [4 ]
Combs, C. Andrew [4 ,5 ]
Heyborne, Kent [6 ]
Porreco, Richard [7 ]
Nageotte, Michael [8 ]
Baker, Susan [9 ]
Gopalani, Sameer [10 ]
Dola, Chi [11 ]
How, Helen [12 ]
Das, Anita F. [13 ]
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Texas Childrens Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Touro Infirm, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[4] Mednax Inc, Ctr Res Educ Qual & Safety, Sunrise, FL USA
[5] Obstetrix Med Grp, San Jose, CA USA
[6] Denver Hlth & Hosp Author, Denver, CO USA
[7] Obstetrix Med Grp Colorado, Denver, CO USA
[8] Long Beach Mem Med Ctr, Long Beach, CA USA
[9] Univ S Alabama, Childrens & Womens Hosp, Mobile, AL USA
[10] Obstetrix Med Grp Washington, Washington, DC USA
[11] Tulane Lakeside Hosp Women & Children, New Orleans, LA USA
[12] Norton Hosp, Louisville, KY USA
[13] Das Consulting Grp, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
AJP REPORTS | 2019年 / 9卷 / 02期
关键词
placenta previa; pessary; hemorrhage; preterm birth; PRETERM BIRTH; CESAREAN DELIVERY; TWIN PREGNANCIES; UNITED-STATES; CERCLAGE; RISK; SINGLETON; LENGTH; METAANALYSIS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1055/s-0039-1687871
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared cervical pessary (CP) versus expectant management (EM) in women with placenta previa between 22.0 and 32.0 in prolonging gestation until36.0 weeks' gestation. Study Design This study took place from November 2016 to June 2018. Women were randomized to receive either the Bioteque CP or EM. The pessary was removed at36.0 weeks unless indicated. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery, with secondary outcomes including need for transfusion, number and duration of antepartum admissions, type of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. A total of 140 patients were needed to show a 3-week prolongation of pregnancy in the pessary group; however, the trial was stopped early due to budgetary issues. Results Of the 33 eligible women, 17 were enrolled. Although not statistically significant, the mean GA at delivery in the CP group was greater than women in the EM group (36.5 +/- 1.23 vs. 36.0 +/- 2.0; p=0.1673). The number and duration of antepartum admissions was greater in the EM group (2.7 +/- 0.58 vs. 16.0 +/- 22.76 days; p=0.1264) as well. Conclusion Although the study was underpowered to determine the primary outcome, safety and feasibility of CP in pregnancies complicated with previa were demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:E160 / E166
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Membrane sweeping versus transcervical Foley catheter for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial
    Yong, Soon L.
    Ting, Joyce C.
    Wong, Xiu S.
    Wong, George H.
    Kang, Marcus
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024,
  • [32] Study protocol of SWEPIS a Swedish multicentre register based randomised controlled trial to compare induction of labour at 41 completed gestational weeks versus expectant management and induction at 42 completed gestational weeks
    Elden, Helen
    Hagberg, Henrik
    Wessberg, Anna
    Sengpiel, Verena
    Herbst, Andreas
    Bullarbo, Maria
    Bergh, Christina
    Bolin, Kristian
    Malbasic, Snezana
    Saltvedt, Sissel
    Stephansson, Olof
    Wikstrom, Anna-Karin
    Ladfors, Lars
    Wennerholm, Ulla-Britt
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2016, 16
  • [33] 17-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate versus vaginal progesterone suppository for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a sonographically short cervix: A randomized controlled trial
    Pirjani, Reihaneh
    Heidari, Reza
    Rahimi-Foroushani, Abbas
    Bayesh, Seyedehsara
    Esmailzadeh, Arezoo
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (01) : 57 - 64
  • [34] How can methods of placental delivery in cesarean section affect perioperative blood loss? A randomized controlled trial of controlled cord traction versus manual removal of placenta
    Altraigey, Ahmed
    Ellaithy, Mohamed
    Atia, Hytham
    Ali, Ibrahim
    Kolkailah, Mohamed
    Abbas, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 45 (01) : 133 - 140
  • [35] Cost-effectiveness of curettage vs. expectant management in women with an incomplete evacuation after misoprostol treatment for first-trimester miscarriage: a randomized controlled trial and cohort study
    Lemmers, Marike
    Verschoor, Marianne A. C.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M.
    Huirne, Judith A. F.
    Spinder, Teake
    Nieboer, Theodoor E.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Janssen, Ineke A. H.
    Van Hooff, Marcel H. A.
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    Ankum, Willem M.
    Bosmans, Judith E.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (03) : 294 - 300
  • [36] Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial
    Barda, Giulia
    Herman, Hadas Ganer
    Sagiv, Ron
    Bar, Jacob
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (20) : 2777 - 2781
  • [37] Clinical versus laboratory screening for sexually transmitted infections prior to insertion of intrauterine contraception among women living with HIV/AIDS: a randomized controlled trial
    Kakaire, Othman
    Byamugisha, Josaphat Kayogoza
    Tumwesigye, Nazarius Mbona
    Gemzell-Danielsson, Kristina
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (07) : 1573 - 1579
  • [38] An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial for comparison of continuous phenylephrine versus norepinephrine infusion in prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery
    Vallejo, M. C.
    Attaallah, A. F.
    Elzamzamy, O. M.
    Cifarelli, D. T.
    Phelps, A. L.
    Hobbs, G. R.
    Shapiro, R. E.
    Ranganathan, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2017, 29 : 18 - 25
  • [39] P6 acupressure versus sham acupressure for prevention of intraoperative nausea and vomiting during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial ☆
    Woodward, S. K.
    Mccrory, E. H.
    Neumann, K. E.
    Lu, S. F.
    Mccarthy, R. J.
    Peralta, F. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2024, 60
  • [40] Comparison of cesarean delivery rates after 3 methods of cervical ripening among obese women at or after 41 weeks - Secondary analysis of two French randomized controlled trials: MAGPOP and CYTOPRO
    Estrade, Marine
    Diguisto, Caroline
    Arnaud, Catherine
    Ehlinger, Virginie
    Vayssiere, Pr Christophe
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2023, 291 : 16 - 21