Development and validation of optimal cut-off value in inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference for prediction of cardiovascular events

被引:13
作者
Hirono, Akira [1 ]
Kusunose, Kenya [1 ]
Kageyama, Norihito [2 ]
Sumitomo, Masayuki [3 ]
Abe, Masahiro [4 ]
Fujinaga, Hiroyuki [5 ]
Sata, Masataka [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokushima Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, 2-50-1 Kuramoto, Tokushima 7700003, Japan
[2] Tokushima Prefectural Miyoshi Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokushima, Japan
[3] Tokushima Prefectural Miyoshi Hosp, Dept Surg, Tokushima, Japan
[4] Univ Tokushima, Grad Sch, Inst Biomed Sci, Dept Hematol Endocrinol & Metab, Tokushima, Japan
[5] Tokushima Prefectural Cent Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Tokushima, Japan
关键词
Inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference; Cardiovascular risk; Optimal cut-off value; PULSE-WAVE VELOCITY; RISK-FACTORS; ALL-CAUSE; DISEASE; MORTALITY; ASSOCIATION; METAANALYSIS; ATHEROSCLEROSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jjcc.2017.06.010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: An inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference (IAD) is associated with cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the optimal cut-off value of IAD as a predictor of major adverse cardiac events in patients with arteriosclerosis risk factors. Methods: From 2009 to 2014,1076 patients who had at least one cardiovascular risk factor were included in the analysis. We defined 700 randomly selected patients as a development cohort to confirm that IAD was the predictor of cardiovascular events and to determine optimal cut-off value of IAD. Next, we validated outcomes in the remaining 376 patients as a validation cohort. The blood pressure (BP) of both arms measurements were done simultaneously using the ankle-brachial blood pressure index (ABI) form of automatic device. The primary endpoint was the cardiovascular event and secondary endpoint was the all-cause mortality. Results: During a median period of 2.8 years, 143 patients reached the primary endpoint in the development cohort. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, IAD was the strong predictor of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.05, p = 0.005). The receiver operating characteristic curve revealed that 5 mmHg was the optimal cut-off point of IAD to predict cardiovascular events (p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the presence of a large IAD (IAD >= 5 mmHg) was significantly associated with the primary endpoint (p = 0.021). Conclusions: IAD is significantly associated with future cardiovascular events in patients with arteriosclerosis risk factors. The optimal cut-off value of IAD is 5 mmHg. (C) 2017 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 30
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Development and validation of a cardiovascular risk prediction model for Japanese: the Hisayama study
    Arima, Hisatomi
    Yonemoto, Koji
    Doi, Yasufumi
    Ninomiya, Toshiharu
    Hata, Jun
    Tanizaki, Yumihiro
    Fukuhara, Masayo
    Matsumura, Kiyoshi
    Iida, Mitsuo
    Kiyohara, Yutaka
    [J]. HYPERTENSION RESEARCH, 2009, 32 (12) : 1119 - 1122
  • [2] Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: An updated meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Cao, Kaiwu
    Xu, Jingsong
    Qing Shangguan
    Hu, Weitong
    Li, Ping
    Cheng, Xiaoshu
    Su, Hai
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 189 : 211 - 219
  • [3] Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Clark, Christopher E.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Shore, Angela C.
    Campbell, John L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2016, 66 (652) : E838 - E847
  • [4] Association of a difference in systolic blood pressure between arms with vascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Clark, Christopher E.
    Taylor, Rod S.
    Shore, Angela C.
    Ukoumunne, Obioha C.
    Campbell, John L.
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 379 (9819) : 905 - 914
  • [5] Inter-arm blood pressure difference in type 2 diabetes: a barrier to effective management?
    Clark, Christopher E.
    Greaves, Colin J.
    Evans, Philip H.
    Dickens, Andy
    Campbell, John L.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2009, 59 (563) : 428 - 432
  • [6] Improving coronary heart disease risk assessment in asymptomatic people - Role of traditional risk factors and noninvasive cardiovascular tests
    Greenland, P
    Smith, SC
    Grundy, SM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (15) : 1863 - 1867
  • [7] Upper Extremity Blood Pressure Difference in Patients Undergoing Carotid Revascularisation
    Huibers, A.
    Hendrikse, J.
    Brown, M. M.
    Pegge, S. A.
    Arnold, M.
    Moll, F. L.
    Kapelle, L. J.
    de Borst, G. J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 53 (02) : 153 - 157
  • [8] Age- and Sex-Specific Burden of Cardiovascular Disease Attributable to 5 Major and Modifiable Risk Factors in 10 Asian Countries of the Western Pacific Region
    Huxley, Rachel R.
    Hirakawa, Yoichiro
    Hussain, Mohammad Akhtar
    Aekplakorn, Wichai
    Wang, Xin
    Peters, Sanne A. E.
    Mamun, Abdullah
    Woodward, Mark
    [J]. CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2015, 79 (08) : 1662 - U262
  • [9] Cut-Off Value of Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity to Predict Cardiovascular Disease in Hypertensive Patients: A Cohort Study
    Kawai, Tatsuo
    Ohishi, Mitsuru
    Onishi, Miyuki
    Ito, Norihisa
    Takeya, Yasushi
    Maekawa, Yoshihiro
    Rakugi, Hiromi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND THROMBOSIS, 2013, 20 (04) : 391 - 400
  • [10] Significant interarm blood pressure difference predicts cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients CoCoNet study
    Kim, Su-A
    Kim, Jang Young
    Park, Jeong Bae
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (24)