Comparison of breath-alcohol screening test results with venous blood alcohol concentration in suspected drunken drivers

被引:20
作者
Kriikku, Pirkko [1 ,2 ]
Wilhelm, Lars [3 ]
Jenckel, Stefan [3 ]
Rintatalo, Janne [4 ]
Hurme, Jukka [1 ]
Kramer, Jan [3 ,5 ]
Jones, A. Wayne [6 ]
Ojanpera, Ilkka [2 ]
机构
[1] Vita Lab, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Hjelt Inst, Dept Forens Med, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[3] LADR GmbH Med Versorgungszentrum, Geesthacht, Germany
[4] Natl Bur Invest Forens Lab, Vantaa, Finland
[5] Univ Lubeck, Dept Med 1, Lubeck, Germany
[6] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Alcohol; Driving; Blood; Breath; Roadside screening; Traffic safety; MOUTH ALCOHOL; DRINKING; INTOXICATION; VARIABILITY; ETHANOL; POLICE; RATIO;
D O I
10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.03.019
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Hand-held electronic breath-alcohol analyzers are widely used by police authorities in their efforts to detect drunken drivers and to improve road-traffic safety. Over a three month period, the results of roadside breath-alcohol tests of drivers apprehended in Finland were compared with venous blood alcohol concentration (BAC). The mean (median) time between sampling blood and breath was 0.71 h (0.58 h) with a range from 0 to 6 h. Some hand-held instruments gave results as the concentration of alcohol in breath and were converted into BAC assuming a blood-breath alcohol ratio (BBR) of 2260. The mean venous BAC (1.82 g/kg) in traffic offenders was higher than the result predicted by the hand-held breath analyzers (1.72 g/kg). In 1875 roadside tests, the relationship between venous BAC (x) and BrAC (y) was defined by the regression equation y = 0.18 + 0.85x. The coefficients show both a constant bias (y-intercept 0.18 g/kg) and a proportional bias (slope = 0.85). The residual standard deviation (SD), an indicator of random variation, was +/- 0.40 g/kg. After BAC results were corrected for the time elapsed between sampling blood and breath, the y-intercept decreased to 0.10 g/kg and 0.004 g/kg, respectively, when low (0.1 g/kg/h) and high (0.25 g/kg/h) rates of alcohol elimination were used. The proportional bias of 0.85 shows that the breath-alcohol test result reads lower than the actual BAC by 15% on average. This suggests that the BBR of 2260 used for calibration should be increased by about 15% to give closer agreement between BAC and BrAC. Because of the large random variation (SD +/- 0.40 g/kg), there is considerable uncertainty if and when results from the roadside screening test are used to estimate venous BAC. The roadside breath-alcohol screening instruments worked well for the purpose of selecting drivers above the statutory limit of 0.50 g/kg. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 61
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [2] Calibration Stability of the Alco-Sensor FST Over a Seven Week Period
    Booker, Richelle
    Lehmann, G.
    Korkosh, Sandra
    [J]. CANADIAN SOCIETY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2012, 45 (04) : 176 - 178
  • [3] FALKENSSON M, 1989, CLIN CHEM, V35, P918
  • [4] Random breath testing in Queensland and Western Australia: Examination of how the random breath testing rate influences alcohol related traffic crash rates
    Ferris, Jason
    Mazerolle, Lorraine
    King, Mark
    Bates, Lyndel
    Bennett, Sarah
    Devaney, Madonna
    [J]. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2013, 60 : 181 - 188
  • [5] GULLBERG RG, 1992, J FORENSIC SCI, V37, P1363
  • [6] Jaffe DH, 2013, J FORENSIC SCI, V58, P1233, DOI 10.1111/1556-4029.12157
  • [7] Jones A W, 1996, Forensic Sci Rev, V8, P13
  • [8] Jones A W, 2000, Forensic Sci Rev, V12, P23
  • [9] Jones A.W., 2011, Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisons, Vfourth, P87
  • [10] Evidence-based survey of the elimination rates of ethanol from blood with applications in forensic casework
    Jones, Alan Wayne
    [J]. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 200 (1-3) : 1 - 20