Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women

被引:284
作者
Zhang, J
Troendle, JF
Yancey, MK
机构
[1] NICHHD, Epidemiol Branch, Div Epidemiol Stat & Prevent Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] Tripler Army Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Honolulu, HI 96859 USA
关键词
arrest; labor curve; nullipara; protraction; cesarean;
D O I
10.1067/mob.2002.127142
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to examine the pattern of labor progression in nulliparous parturients in contemporary obstetric practice. STUDY DESIGN: We extracted detailed labor data from 1329 nulliparous parturients with a term, singleton, vertex fetus of normal birth weight after spontaneous onset of labor, Cesarean deliveries were excluded, We used a repeated-measures regression with a 10th-order polynomial function to discover the average labor curve under contemporary practice. With use of an interval-censored regression with a log normal distribution, we also computed the expected time interval of the cervix to reach the next centimeter, the expected rate of cervical dilation at each phase of labor, and the duration of labor for fetal descent at various stations. RESULTS: Our average labor curve differs markedly from the Friedman curve. The cervix dilated substantially slower in the active phase. It took approximately 5.5 hours from 4 cm to 10 cm, compared with 2.5 hours under the Friedman curve. We observed no deceleration phase. Before 7 cm, no perceivable change in cervical dilation for more than 2 hour was not uncommon. The 5th percentiles of rate of cervical dilation were all below 1 cm per hour. The 95th percentile of time interval for fetal descent from station +1/3 to +2/3 was 3 hours at the second stage. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the pattern of labor progression in contemporary practice differs significantly from the Friedman curve. The diagnostic criteria for protraction and arrest disorders of labor may be too stringent in nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:824 / 828
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The duration of labor in healthy women [J].
Albers L.L. .
Journal of Perinatology, 1999, 19 (2) :114-119
[2]   The length of active labor in normal pregnancies [J].
Albers, LL ;
Schiff, M ;
Gorwoda, JG .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (03) :355-359
[3]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1995, TECHN B AM COLL OBST, V218
[4]  
Crowder MJ, 1990, ANAL REPEATED MEASUR
[5]   PRIMIGRAVID LABOR - A GRAPHICOSTATISTICAL ANALYSIS [J].
FRIEDMAN, EA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1955, 6 (06) :567-589
[6]  
Friedman EA, 1978, LABOR CLIN EVALUATIO, V2nd
[7]   NORMAL CERVICAL DILATATION PATTERN IN LATE PREGNANCY AND LABOR [J].
HENDRICKS, CH ;
BRENNER, WE ;
KRAUS, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1970, 106 (07) :1065-+
[8]   Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: Prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term [J].
Impey, L ;
Hobson, J ;
O'Herlihy, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (02) :438-443
[9]  
KELLY G, 2001, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V182, pS129
[10]  
KILPATRICK SJ, 1989, OBSTET GYNECOL, V74, P85