Lactation among adolescent mothers and subsequent bone mineral density

被引:58
作者
Chantry, CJ
Auinger, P
Byrd, RS
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Sacramento, CA 95817 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Dept Pediat, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Amer Acad Pediat Ctr Child Hlth Res, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 2004年 / 158卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.158.7.650
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the association of breastfeeding during adolescence with bone mineral density (BMD) during young adulthood. Methods: Secondary analysis of data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey conducted from 1988 through 1994, was performed. The BMDs for 5 regions of the proximal femur as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry were compared for 5 groups of women aged 20 to 25 years (n = 819) the groups included those who had been: (1) adolescent mothers and had breastfed (n = 94), (2) adolescent mothers and had not breastfed (n = 151), (3) mothers who first gave birth as adults and breastfed (n = 67), (4) mothers who first gave birth as adults and had not breastfed (n = 89), and (5) nulliparous (n = 418). SUDAAN software was used to account for the complex sampling design of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Adjusted mean differences in BMD were estimated using least-squares linear regression. Results: During young adulthood, women who breastfed during adolescence had higher adjusted BMDs, which was statistically significant in 4 of the 5 regions, than those who had not breastfed (total proximal femur area difference, 0.049 gm/cm(2) [95% confidence interval, 0.002-0.095]) and BMDs equivalent to nulliparous women (total proximal femur area difference, 0.024 gm/cm(2) [95% confidence interval, -0.023 to 0.071]). Adjusting also for obstetric variables, women who breastfed during adolescence had higher BMDs in all 5 regions compared with their peers who had not breastfed (total proximal femur area difference, 0.053 gm/cm(2) [95% confidence interval, 0.029-0.077]). Conclusions: In this nationally representative sample, breastfeeding by adolescent mothers was associated with greater BMD in the proximal femur during young adulthood. Lactation was not found to be detrimental and may be protective to the bone health of adolescent mothers.
引用
收藏
页码:650 / 656
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Changes in bone mineral density and calcium metabolism in breastfeeding women: A one year follow-up study [J].
Affinito, P ;
Tommaselli, GA ;
DiCarlo, C ;
Guida, F ;
Nappi, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1996, 81 (06) :2314-2318
[2]   COMPENDIUM OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES - CLASSIFICATION OF ENERGY COSTS OF HUMAN PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES [J].
AINSWORTH, BE ;
HASKELL, WL ;
LEON, AS ;
JACOBS, DR ;
MONTOYE, HJ ;
SALLIS, JF ;
PAFFENBARGER, RS .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1993, 25 (01) :71-80
[3]   DETERMINANTS OF BONE MASS IN POST-MENOPAUSAL WOMEN [J].
ALOIA, JF ;
VASWANI, AN ;
YEH, JK ;
ROSS, P ;
ELLIS, K ;
COHN, SH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1983, 143 (09) :1700-1704
[4]  
Anburajan M, 2001, J Assoc Physicians India, V49, P442
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Vital Health Stat 1, P1
[6]  
CHAN GM, 1982, J PEDIATR-US, V101, P767, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3476(82)80316-8
[7]   Is caffeine associated with bone mineral density in young adult women? [J].
Conlisk, AJ ;
Galuska, DA .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (05) :562-568
[8]   CALCIUM HOMEOSTASIS AND BONE METABOLISM DURING PREGNANCY, LACTATION, AND POSTWEANING - A LONGITUDINAL-STUDY [J].
CROSS, NA ;
HILLMAN, LS ;
ALLEN, SH ;
KRAUSE, GF ;
VIEIRA, NE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1995, 61 (03) :514-523
[9]   BONE-DENSITY AT VARIOUS SITES FOR PREDICTION OF HIP-FRACTURES [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
BLACK, DM ;
NEVITT, MC ;
BROWNER, W ;
CAULEY, J ;
ENSRUD, K ;
GENANT, HK ;
PALERMO, L ;
SCOTT, J ;
VOGT, TM .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8837) :72-75
[10]  
Gartner LM, 1997, PEDIATRICS, V100, P1035, DOI 10.1542/peds.100.6.1035